Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

T cell and monocyte-derived burst-promoting activity directly act on erythroid progenitor cells

Abstract

While the terminal stages of erythroid differentiation are regulated by the hormone erythropoietin, the early stages of proliferation and differentiation of immature erythroid progenitor cells also depend on cellular factors functionally defined as burst-promoting activity (BPA)1–4. Thus, in vitro there is suboptimal development of primitive erythroid progenitor cells (burst-forming units—erythroid, BFU-E) into colonies unless a source of BPA is added. It has been demonstrated that T cells5–8 and monocytes8–10 produce BPA. Monocytes may represent the main source of BPA and the major role of T cells may be to augment BPA production by monocytes10. Irradiated bone marrow cells, which contain T cells, monocytes and other BPA-producing cells, also promote BFU-E colony formation11. As these studies used crude BFU-E populations as target cells, it was not possible to define which of the accessory cell products act directly on the progenitor cell. Here we have used a panel of monoclonal antibodies to purify BFU-E from peripheral blood. We demonstrate that BPA produced by both a monocyte and a T-cell line acts directly on the erythroid progenitor cell and can support colony formation by single BFU-E.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iscove, N. N. Cell Tissue Kinetics 10, 323–334 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mara, H. & Ogawa, M. Expl Haemat. 5, 141–148 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Iscove, N. N. ICN – UCLA Symp. molec. cell. Biol. Vol?, 37–82 (1978).

  4. Tsang, R. W. & Aye, M. T. Expl Haemat. 7, 383–388 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nathan, D. G. et al. J. exp. Med. 147, 324–329 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mangan, K. F. & Desforges, J. F. Expl Haemat. 8, 717–727 (1980).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Torok-Storb, B. J., Martin, P. J. & Hansen, J. A. Blood 58, 171–174 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reid, C. D. L., Baptista, L. C. & Chanarin, I. Br. J. Haemat. 58, 171–174 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gordon, L. I., Miller, W. J., Branda, R. F., Zanjani, E. D. & Jacob, H. S. Blood 55, 1047–1050 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zuckerman, K. S. J. clin. Invest. 67, 702–709 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Linch, D. C., Lipton, J. M. & Nathan, D. G. J. clin. Invest. (submitted).

  12. Golde, D. W., Bersch, N., Quan, S. G. & Lusis, A. J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 593–596 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Abboud, C. N., Brennan, J. K., Barlow, G. H. & Lichtman, M. A. Blood 58, 1148–1154 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Indivieri, F., Wilson, B. S., Pellegrino, M. A. & Ferrone, S. J. immun. Meth. 29, 101–104 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Griffin, J. D., Beveridge, P. & Schlossman, S. F. Blood 60, 30–35 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nissen, C., Moser, Y. & Speck, B. Br. J. Haemat. 51, 385–390 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Beverley, P. C. L. & Callard, R. F. Eur. J. Immun. 11, 329–334 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wisniewski, D., Platsoucas, C., Strife, A., Lambek, C. & Clarkson, B. Expl Haemat. 10, 817–829 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nadler, L. M. et al. J. Immun. 126, 1941–1947 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beverley, P. C. L., Linch, D. C. & Delia, D. Nature 287, 332 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Iscove, N. N., Sieber, F. & Winterhaller, K. H. J. cell. Physiol. 83, 309–320 (1974).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nadler, L. M. et al. Hum. Immun. 1, 77–90 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Linch, D., Nathan, D. T cell and monocyte-derived burst-promoting activity directly act on erythroid progenitor cells. Nature 312, 775–777 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/312775a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/312775a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing