Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Time course of O6-methylguanine removal from DNA of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-treatedhuman fibroblasts

Abstract

Methylating mutagens are thought to act by induction of direct miscoding, mainly through formation of O6-methylguanine (O6MeG) in DNA of, for example, T-even bacteriophage1, Escherichia coli2, and a cultured Chinese hamster cell line3. A positive correlation between this reaction in DNA of target tissues and subsequent induction of tumours has been found for rat kidney tumours4 and thymic lymphomas in mice5. These effects are thought to be counteracted by an enzymatic repair process, which removes O6-MeG from DNA (first found in E. coli6, then in liver of rats7 and mice5). The predominance of liver as the site of this action in vivo led to suggestions7 that this could account for the relative lack of susceptibility of liver tissue to methylating carcinogens, and also that the enzyme involved might be inducible8. Evidence for the latter has been claimed for rat liver9, but is most convincing in E. coli10 where inhibition of this enzymatic action is achieved by treating cells with chloram-phenicol before methylation11, thus specifically inhibiting protein synthesis. As there is very limited removal of O6-MeG from methylated cellular DNA, compared with that of 3-methyladenine (3-MeA, a suggested DNA template-inactivating base), it is thought that the former reaction is mediated by a protein which is consumed by the reaction12. There have been reports13,14 that human cells also can remove O6-MeG, but the data did not clarify the time- and dose-dependencies of the process. We report here more effective removal at lower extents of methylation, which suggests a nonlinear dose response to methylating mutagens and carcinogens for human cells. There were no significant deficiencies in methylpurine removal from DNA of patients with ataxia telangectasia (AT) or xeroderma pigmentosum (XP).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Loveless, A. Nature 223, 206–207 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeggo, P. J. Bact. 139, 783–791 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Newbold, R. F., Warren, W., Medcalf, A. S. C. & Amos, J. Nature 283, 596–599 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nicoll, J. W., Swann, P. F. & Pegg, A. E. Nature 254, 261–262 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Frei, J. V., Swenson, D. H., Warren, W. & Lawley, P. D. Biochem. J. 174, 1031–1044 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lawley, P. D. & Orr, D. J. Chemico-biol. Interactions 2, 154–157 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. O'Connor, P. J., Capps, M. J. & Craig, A. W. Br. J. Cancer 27, 153–166 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lawley, P. D. IARC Sci. Publ 12, 181–210 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Montesano, R., Brésil, H. & Margison, G. P. Cancer Res. 39, 1798–1802 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Samson, L. & Cairns, J. Nature 267, 281–282 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Warren, W. & Lawley, P. D. Carcinogenesis 1, 67–78 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Robins, P. & Cairns, J. Nature 280, 74–76 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goth-Goldstein, R. Nature 267, 81–82 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Akamirano-Dimas, M., Sklar, R. & Strauss, B. Mutat. Res. 60, 197–206 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weichselbaum, R. R., Nove, J. & Little, J. B. Nature 271, 261–262 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Karran, P., Lindahl, T. & Griffin, B. Nature 280, 76–77 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lawley, P. D. & Warren, W. Chemico-biol Interactions 12, 211–220 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lehninger, A. L. Biochemistry 2nd edn, 832–833 (Worth, New York, 1976).

  19. Preussmann, R. in Primary Liver Tumours (eds Remmer, H., Bolt, H. M., Bannasch, P. & Popper, H.) 11–29 (MTP Press Ltd., Lancaster, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kakunaga, T. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 1334–1338 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Arai, M. et al. Gann 70, 549–558 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maher, V. M., Dorney, D. J. Mendrala, A. L. Konze-Thomas, B. & McCormick, J. J. Mutat. Res. 62, 311–323 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Penman, B. W., Hoppe, H. IV & Thilly, W. G. J. natn. Cancer Inst. 63, 903–907 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cox, R. & Masson, W. K. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 26, 193–196 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kirby, K. S. Biochem. J. 66, 495–504 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Medcalf, A., Lawley, P. Time course of O6-methylguanine removal from DNA of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-treatedhuman fibroblasts. Nature 289, 796–798 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/289796a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/289796a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing