Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

No need for a new membrane model

Abstract

Schindler et al.1 recently reported lateral diffusion measurements in reconstituted membranes of phospholipid (PL), lipo-polysaccharide (LPS) and Escherichia coli matrix protein (P), using the technique of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). Evaluation of their data led Schindler et al. to conclude that the fluid mosaic model is an inadequate description of the membrane and to propose a new membrane model. Their conclusion was based on identifying the fluid mosaic model with a particular binding behaviour of LPS to matrix protein. I present here a more general model for the association of membrane components, and demonstrate the use of lateral diffusion data in elucidating membrane structure. The data of Schindler et al. are shown to be reasonably interpretable on the basis of an association of LPS and matrix protein, which obviates the necessity for postulating a new membrane model.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schindler, M., Osborn, M. J. & Koppel, D. E. Nature 283, 346–350 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schindler, H. & Rosenbusch, J. P. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 3751–3755 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jähnig, F. No need for a new membrane model. Nature 289, 694–696 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/289694a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/289694a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing