Abstract
Observations suggest that a small flux of secondary antiprotons (p̄), created in the interaction of cosmic ray nuclei with interstellar gas, should also be present in the primary cosmic radiation. Calculations based on accelerator data for the production of p̄ and existing models for the propagation of cosmic rays, predict too small a flux of p̄ compared with the finite flux observed recently1. Although the observed excess could be attributed to the existence of primary cosmic ray antimatter, the experimental upper limits2,3 of the ratio of antinuclei to nuclei of charge |Z| ≥ 2 seem to contradict this. Here we use a ‘modified closed galaxy’ model to attribute this excess to secondary antiprotons. In this model, ∼50% of the observed cosmic ray nucleons are of recent origin and they propagate according to the ‘nested leaky box’ model, while the rest propagate according to ‘closed galaxy’ model. This model explains the observations on p̄ and e+, and predicts more D and 3He than do the existing models.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Golden, R. L. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1196–1199 (1979).
Badhwar, G. D. et al. Nature 274, 137–139 (1978).
Smoot, G. F., Buffington, A. & Orth, C. D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 258–261 (1975).
Gaisser, T. K. & Maurer, R. H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1264–1267 (1973).
Badhwar, G. D., Golden, R. L., Brown, M. L. & Lacy, J. L. Astrophys. Space Sci. 37, 283–300 (1975).
Szabelski, J., Wdowczyk, J. & Wolfendale, A. W. Nature 285, 386–388 (1980).
Stephens, S. A. Astrophys. Space Sci. (in the press).
Orth, C. D., Buffington, A., Smoot, G. F. & Mast, T. S. Astrophys. J. 226, 1147–1161 (1978).
Juliusson, E., Mayer, P. & Muller, D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 445–448 (1972).
Cowsik, R. & Wilson, L. W. Proc. 13th int. Cosmic Ray Conf. 1, 500–505 (1973).
Bogomolov, E. A. et al. Proc. 16th int. Cosmic Ray Conf. 1, 330–335 (1979).
Daniel, R. R. & Stephens, S. A. Bull. astr. Soc. Ind. (in the press).
Rasmussen, I. L. & Peters, B. Nature 258, 412–413 (1975).
Badhwar, G. D. & Stephens, S. A. Proc. 15th int. Cosmic Ray Conf. 1, 398–403 (1977).
Badhwar, G. D. & Stephens, S. A. Phys. Rev. D 14, 356–358 (1976).
Buffington, A., Orth, C. D. & Mast, T. S. Astrophys. J. 226, 355–371 (1978).
Fanselow, J. L., Hartman, R. C., Hildebrand, R. H. & Mayer, P. Astrophys. J. 158, 771–780 (1969).
Golden, R. L. et al. Preprint PSL-PE00947 (1979).
Buffington, A. & Orth, C. D. Astrophys. J. 199, 669–679 (1975).
Peters, B. & Westergaard, N. J. Astrophys. Space Sci. 48, 21–46 (1977).
Daniel, R. R. & Stephens, S. A. Space Science Review 17, 45–158 (1975).
Badhwar, G. D., Stephens, S. A. & Golden, R. L. Proc. 14th int. Cosmic Ray Conf. 9, 3183–3187 (1975).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stephens, S. Cosmic ray antiprotons and modified closed galaxy model. Nature 289, 267–269 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/289267a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/289267a0
This article is cited by
-
Cosmic radiation, production of antimatter and their implications
Il Nuovo Cimento C (1991)
-
Matter and antimatter in the same universe?
La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento (1989)
-
The closed galaxy model, particle production mechanisms and the effects of scaling violation on π/p ratio
Il Nuovo Cimento C (1988)
-
Adiabatic deceleration of secondary antiprotons in the envelopes of supernova exploding in dense clouds
Astrophysics and Space Science (1985)
-
On the reported detection of sub-GeV antiprotons in galactic cosmic rays
Nature (1982)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.