Abstract
A much-discussed, quantitative criterion for the spread of an altruistic gene is Hamilton's rule1,2c/b < R (1) where c and b are additive decrement and increment to fitness of altruist and recipient, respectively, and R is a measure of genetic relatedness between the two individuals. When rearranged as −c.1+b.R > 0, the rule can be interpreted as requiring that the gene-caused action increase the ‘inclusive fitness’ of the actor. Since its introduction, Hamilton's rule and the attendant concept of inclusive fitness have gained increasing acceptance and use among biologists and have become integral in the field now named sociobiology. However, the essentially heuristic reasoning used in deriving these concepts, along with the lack of a complete specification even in the original outbred model2, have led to many investigations into the population genetical underpinnings of Hamilton's rule3–18. On the basis of these considerations, several reports3,10,12,13,18 have proposed new formulae for R. These formulae have no obvious relation to each other or to the coefficients originally suggested by Hamilton. This proliferation of coefficients is undoubtedly confusing to many and the net effect may be to generate distrust both of the rule and of the notion of inclusive fitness. Our purpose here is to show that these various formulae for R (refs 3,10,12,13,18), although independently derived, are actually the same.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hamilton, W. D. Am. Nat. 97, 354–356 (1963).
Hamilton, W. D. J. theor. Biol. 7, 1–51 (1964).
Orlove, M. J. J. theor. Biol. 49, 289–310 (1975).
Levitt, P. R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 4531–4535 (1975).
Scudo, F. M. & Ghiselin, M. T. J. Genet. 62, 1–31 (1975).
Charnov, E. L. J. theor. Biol. 66, 541–550 (1977).
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. & Feldman, M. W. Theor. Population Biol. 14, 268–281 (1978).
Charlesworth, B. J. theor. Biol. 72, 297–319 (1978).
Wade, M. J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 6154–6158 (1978); Am. Nat. 113, 399–417 (1979).
Orlove, M. J. & Wood, C. L. J. theor. biol. 73, 679–686 (1978).
Craig, R. Evolution 33, 319–334 (1979).
Michod, R. E. J. theor. Biol. 81, 223–233 (1979).
Flesness, N. R. & Holtzman, R. C. Am. Nat. (in the press).
Michod, R. E. Genetics (in the press).
Michod, R. E. & Abugov, R. Science 210, 667–669 (1980).
Charlesworth, B. in Dahlem Workshop on Social Behaviour: Hypothesis and Empirical Tests (ed. Markl, H.) 11–26 (Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1980).
Abugov, R., Michod, R. E. J. theor Biol. (in the press).
Michod, R. E. & Anderson, W. W. Am. Nat. 114, 637–647 (1979).
Wright, S. Am. Nat. 56, 330–338 (1922).
Hamilton, W. D. in Man and Beast: Comparative Social Behaviour (eds Eisenberg & Dillon) 57–91 (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, 1971).
Hamilton, W. D. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3, 193–232 (1972).
Jacquard, A. The Genetic Structure of Populations (Springer, New York, 1974).
Elston, R. C. & Lange, K. Ann. Hum. Genet. 39, 493–496 (1976).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Michod, R., Hamilton, W. Coefficients of relatedness in sociobiology. Nature 288, 694–697 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/288694a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/288694a0
This article is cited by
-
Evolutionary Connectionism: Algorithmic Principles Underlying the Evolution of Biological Organisation in Evo-Devo, Evo-Eco and Evolutionary Transitions
Evolutionary Biology (2016)
-
Inclusive fitness and the sociobiology of the genome
Biology & Philosophy (2014)
-
Dishonest Signaling in Vertebrate Eusociality
Biological Theory (2014)
-
Gene mobility and the concept of relatedness
Biology & Philosophy (2014)
-
Effective Game Matrix and Inclusive Payoff in Group-Structured Populations
Dynamic Games and Applications (2011)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.