Abstract
The discovery of strong, variable emission lines1, which are Doppler-shifted2 from SS433, led to the development of a kinematic beam model3–5 which explains the principal features of the time varying optical spectrum. In this model two opposed jets of material moving outwards from the central star at 0.258c precess with a period of 164 days, about an axis inclined 80° (or 20°) to the line of sight of the observer. The locus of the two beams forms a cone with an opening half angle of 20° (or 80°) (in the model an ambiguity exists between the inclination and cone angles, as the optical data alone cannot distinguish between the two possibilities). A 13-day period observed in the velocity of the ‘stationary’ lines from this object6 shows that the system is binary. However, other models exist which also account for the time varying optical spectrum. For example, one model suggests that the Doppler-shifted emission lines originate in a ring of material orbiting a solitary massive black hole7. We now report the detection of large-scale X-ray ‘jets’ from SS433. The X-ray emission is diffuse, extending at least 30 arc min from SS433, and is exactly aligned with both SS433 and the bulges of the shell of the huge supernova remnant (SNR) W50. This detection now (1) directly confirms the existence of jets related to SS433, (2) shows the link between SS433 and W50, proving that SS433 is galactic, (3) establishes a minimum age of the jet phenomenon of ∼103 yr, and (4) offers an explanation of why W50 is so much larger than any other known SNR in at least one dimension. The morphology of the diffuse X-ray emission is strikingly similar to that of radio lobes of many extragalactic sources; either in situ heating or particle acceleration is required to explain the appearance of the diffuse X-ray emission.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clark, D. & Murdin, P. Nature 276, 44 (1978).
Margon, B. et al. Astrophys. J. Lett. 230, L41 (1979).
Abell, G. & Margon, B. Nature 279, 701 (1979).
Margon, B., Grandi, S. & Downes, R. Astrophys. J. (submitted).
Fabian, A. & Rees, M. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 187, 13p (1979).
Crampton, D., Cowley, A. & Hutchings, J. Astrophys. J. Lett. 235, L131 (1980).
Ruffini, R. & Stella, L. Nuovo Chim. Lett. 27, 529 (1980).
Giacconi, R. et al. Astrophys. J. 230, 540 (1979).
Kaplan, G. H., Kallarkal, V. V., Harrington, R. S., Johnston, K. J. & Spencer, J. H. Astrophys. J. 85, 64 (1980).
Gilmore, W., Seaquist, E. R., Grindlay, J., Seward, F. & Johnston, K. J. (in preparation).
Geldzahler, B., Pauls, T. & Salter, C. Astr. Astrophys. 84, 237 (1980).
Spencer, R. E. Nature 282, 483 (1979).
Gilmore, W. & Seaquist, E. R. Astrophys. J. (submitted).
Walker, R. C. et al. Astrophys. J. (submitted).
Begelman, M. C., Sarazin, C. L., Hatchett, S. P., McKee, C. F. & Arons, J. Astrophys. J. 238, 722 (1980).
van Gorkom, J., Goss, W. & Shaver, P. Astr. Astrophys. 82, L1 (1980).
van Gorkom, J., Goss, W., Gilmore, W. & Seaquist, E. R. (in preparation).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seward, F., Grindlay, J., Seaquist, E. et al. Diffuse X-ray emission from the jets of SS433. Nature 287, 806–808 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/287806a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/287806a0
This article is cited by
-
Large Scale Jets in Microquasars
Astrophysics and Space Science (2005)
-
Instabilities in astrophysical jets
Astrophysics and Space Science (1996)
-
Observation of stellar remnants from recent Supernovae
Nature (1984)
-
Astrophysical boosters
Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy (1984)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.