Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Effects of density on monospecific stands of marine algae

Abstract

Current ideas on intraspecific competition between plants in monospecific stands stem from work on terrestrial floras. The central tenet is that higher plant density exacts a price from the individuals in a stand: (1) total yield (biomass) per area reaches a constant value at high density (the law of constant final yield1–5); (2) the weight distribution of individuals becomes skewed, with few large and many small plants1,5–8; (3) survival rates may be reduced when plants are sown at higher densities1,9. The effects of density seem to be remarkably similar for primitive as well as higher plants1,2,9–11 and are often summarized by the 3/2 thinning law1,2,5–7,9–11, which indicates that if a stand of plants is sampled through time, the relationship between log weight and log density is a line of −1.5 slope. The basis of this is that mortality is density dependent, so that density is related to time through the thinning process due to crowding. We report here that these effects do not obtain for two species of subtidal marine algae. For the characters which we examined—total yield, plant length, plant dry weight and dry weight of reproductive parts—algae fared better at higher densities. We conclude that there is a difference between marine and terrestrial plants in their responses to density, and we suggest a difference in herbivory due to arthropod–plant associations in each system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harper, J. L. Population Biology of Plants (Academic, London, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kays, S. & Harper, J. L. J. Ecol. 62, 97–105 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Donald, C. M. Aust. J. agric. Res. 2, 355–378 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kira, T., Ogawa, H. & Sakazaki, N. J. Inst. Polytech. Osaka City Univ. D 4, 1–16 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harper, J. L. & White, J. in Dynamics of Populations (eds den Boer, P. J. & Gradwell, G. R.) 41–63 (Centre for Agricultural Publications and Documentation, Wageninger, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mohler, C. L., Marks, P. L. & Sprugel, D. G. J. Ecol. 66, 599–614 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schlesinger, W. H. & Gill, D. S. Ecology 59, 1256–1263 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ogden, J. Proc. N.Z. ecol Soc. 17, 1–9 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yoda, K., Kira, T., Ogawa, H. & Hozumi, K. J. Biol. Osaka City Univ. 14, 107–129 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  10. White, J. & Harper, J. L. J. Ecol. 58, 467–485 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gorham, E. Nature 279, 148–150 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chapman, A. R. O. Phycologia 12, 53–57 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerard, V. A. & Mann, K. H. J. Phycol. 15, 33–41 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mann, K. H. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 28, 778–780 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hodgson, G. L. & Blackman, G. E. J. exp. Bot. 7, 147–165 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshida, T. Bull. Tohoku reg. Fish. Res. Lab. 32, 89–94 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kawashima, S. in Contributions to the Systematics of Benthic Marine Algae of the North Pacific (eds Abbott, I. A. & Kufogi, M.) 93–108 (Japanese Society of Phycology, Kobe, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Feeny, P. Ecology 51, 565–579 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morrow, P. A. & La Marche, V. C. Jr Science 201, 1244–1246 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Root, R. B. Ecol. Monogr. 43, 95–120 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. Biometry (Freeman, San Francisco, 1969).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schiel, D., Choat, J. Effects of density on monospecific stands of marine algae. Nature 285, 324–326 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/285324a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/285324a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing