Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Shoot height, weight and standing crop in relation to density of monospecific plant stands

Abstract

DESPITE great differences in architecture and supporting tissue, monospecific stands of single-stemmed plants ranging in size from a moss to a tree follow a simple rule relating shoot dry weight and standing crop to density. We describe here an equation for this relationship which remains true for almost any fully occupied plant stand dominated by a single species.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yoda, K., Kira, T., Ogawa, H. & Hozumi, K. J. Biol. Osaka Cy Univ. 14, 107–129 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ondok, J. P. in Ecosystem Study on Wetland Biome in Czechoslovakia (ed. Hejný, S.) 83–85 (Czechosl. IBP/PT-PP Rep. no. 3, Třeboň 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mörnsjö, T. Opera bot. No. 24, pp 187 (1969).

  4. Gorham, E. & Bernard, J. M. J. Minn. Acad. Sci. 41, 15–17 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bernard, J. M. & MacDonald, J. G. Jr, Can. J. Bot. 52, 117–123 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gorham, E. & Somers, M. G. Can. J. Bot. 51, 1097–1108 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernard, J. M. Ecology 55, 350–359 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Van der Valk, A. & Davis, C. B. in Freshwater Wetlands (eds Good, R. E., Whigham, D. F. & Simpson, R. L.) 21–37 (Academic, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dykyjová, D. & Hradecká, D. Folia Geobot. phytotax. Praha 11, 23–61 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gorham, E. & Pearsall, W. H. Oikos 7, 206–214 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haslam, S. J. Ecol. 60, 585–610 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kvet, J. in Ecosystem Study on Wetland Biome in Czechoslovakia (ed. Hejný, S.) 93–95 (Czechosl. IBP/PT-PP Rep. no. 3, Třeboň 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mason, C. F. & Bryant, R. J. J. Ecol. 63, 71–95 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ovington, J. D. Ann. Bot. 21, 287–314 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pearsall, W. H. & Gorham, E. Oikos 7, 193–201 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dykyjová, D. & Ondok, J. P. Preslia, Praha 45, 19–30 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schlesinger, W. H. Ecol. Monogr. 48, 43–65 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boyd, C. E. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 98, 144–150 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McNaughton, S. J. Ecol. Monogr. 36, 297–325 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Imbrie, J. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 108, 211–252 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Till, R. Statistical Methods for the Earth Scientist (Wiley, New York, 1974).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. White, J. & Harper, J. L. J. Ecol. 58, 467–485 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Harper, J. L. & White, J. in Proc. Adv. Study Inst. Dynamics Numbers Popul. (eds den Boer, P. J. & Gradwell, G. R.) 41–63 (Oosterbeek, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Whittaker, R. H. Communities and Ecosystems 2nd edn (Macmillan, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  25. White, J. Nature 268, 373 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GORHAM, E. Shoot height, weight and standing crop in relation to density of monospecific plant stands. Nature 279, 148–150 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/279148a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/279148a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing