Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Species richness and stability of space-limited communities

Abstract

ECOLOGICAL competition theory has reached its fullest state of development for the special case of competition for a renewable resource1,2. There are, however, many instances of competition in nature to which this theory does not apply; for example, competition for space (Lebensraum). Because there are many space-limited organisms in nature, including many primary producers, this is an important gap in our theoretical understanding of ecological communities. Moreover, since the fundamental dynamic of competition for space—spatial mobility—is quite different from that of competition for a renewable resource, it would be unwise to try to extrapolate the theory of resource limitation to space-limited communities. In this paper, I outline some calculations, in the spirit of refs 3–7, which bear on the relation between stability and diversity for space-limited communities. (Full details will appear elsewhere.)

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacArthur, R. H., Geographical Ecology (Harper and Row, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  2. May, R. M., Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, J. E., Am. Nat., 104, 547–559 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Levins, R., and Culver, D., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 68, 1246–1248 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Horn, H., and MacArthur, R. H., Ecology, 53, 749–752 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Levin, S. A., Am. Nat., 108, 207–228 (1974); Lectures on Mathematics in the life Sciences, 8 (edit. by Levin, S. A.), 1–35 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Levin, S. A., and Paine, R. T., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 71, 2744–2747 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Skellam, J. G., Biometrika, 38, 196–218 (1951).

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Othmer, H. G., and Scriven, L. E., J. theor. Biol., 32, 507–537 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. May, R. M., Am. Nat., 107, 621–650 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

YODZIS, P. Species richness and stability of space-limited communities. Nature 264, 540–541 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/264540a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/264540a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing