Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

General relativistic incompressibility

Abstract

SIXTY years ago, Schwarzschild1 developed what he, and others through the years, regarded as the general relativistic solution for a static, spherically symmetric, incompressible fluid sphere with equation of state ρ = ρ0 = constant. Others have rejected the incompressibility interpretation of this solution including Eddington2 who regarded ρ−3p = constant as the incompressible equation of state. We present here a new definition of incompressibility, consistent with basic principles of relativity. We then consider the natural generalisation of the Schwarzschild equation of state to general relativity, namely the constancy of proper density, and find that this approximates a truly incompressible fluid more closely than that presented by both Schwarzschild and Eddington. This could have interesting consequences in astrophysics since the maximum value of gravitational redshift, as well as the upper limit to the mass of a neutron star, are larger for this model than for the Schwarzschild model, which is traditionally considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwarzschild, K., Sitzber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 424 (1916).

  2. Eddington, A. S., The Mathematical Theory of Relativity, 122 (Cambridge University Press, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buchdahl, H. A., Phys. Rev., 116, 1027 (1959).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Weinberg, S., Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, Sec. 11. 6 (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bludman, S. A., and Ruderman, M., Phys. Rev., 170, 1176 (1968); D 1, 3243 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruderman, M., Phys. Rev., 172, 1286 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Adler, R., Bazin, M., and Schiffer, M., Introduction to General Relativity, Sec. 14. 2 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bondi, H., Proc. R. Soc., A282, 303 (1964); Lectures on General Relativity, Brandeis Summer Institute in Theoretical Physics, 1964 (edit. by Deser, S., and Ford, K. W.), (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Veny, J. B., Osborn, W. H., and Janes, K., Pub. astr. Soc. Pacif., 83, 611 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

COOPERSTOCK, F., SARRACINO, R. General relativistic incompressibility. Nature 264, 529–531 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/264529a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/264529a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing