Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Non-adaptive rejection of small tumour inocula as a model of immune surveillance

Nature volume 264, pages 356–359 (1976)Cite this article

Abstract

THOMAS'S thesis1 that it is a “universal requirement of multicellular organisms to preserve uniformity of cell type”, led him to suggest that the phenomenon of homograft rejection represented the primary mechanism for natural defence against neoplasia. Burnet2 viewed this surveillance of lethal oncogenic mutations as a function of the thymus-dependent adaptive immune system. Prehn3,4 and others5–7 have criticised the Burnet model of immune surveillance because it is unable to account for several important observations: (1) the adaptive immune system, with only rare exceptions, is unable to eliminate incipient or induced tumours rather than functioning as a surveillance mechanism4,6–8; (2) the immune response to tumours is as likely to result in immunosuppression and enhancement of tumour growth as the destruction of those tumours6,8,9; and (3) the incidence of spontaneous tumours in athymic mice is insignificant5. To explain these data one must either assume that surveillance does not exist, or one must postulate that surveillance exists in a form other than the thymus-dependent adaptive immune response. We have attempted to examine the hypothesis that surveillance exists and is a non-thymus-dependent phenomenon by an experimental model in which the fate of a small tumour inoculum, simulating an oncogenic mutation, is examined after manipulation of the host's immune response.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thomas, L. Cellular and Humoral Aspects of the Hypersensitivity States (edit. by Lawrence, H. S.), 529 (Cassell, London 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burnet, M. Immunological Surveillance (Pergamon, London 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prehn, P. T. Proc. 10th Can. Cancer Res. Conf. Honey Harbour, Ontario (edit. by Scholefield, P. G.), 137 (University of Toronto Press, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Prehn, P. T. Immune Surveillance: Proc. Brook Lodge Conf. (edit. by Smith, P. T., and Landy, M.), (Academic, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rygaard, J. and Povlsen, C. O. Transplant. Rev., 28, 43–60 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gillette, R. W. and Fox, A. Cell. Immun., 19, 328–335 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stutman, O. Science, 183, 534–536 (1974).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Skov, C. B., Holland, J. M. and Perkins, E. H. J. natn. Cancer Inst., 56, 193–195 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fujimoto, S., Greene, M. I. and Sehon, A., J. Immun., 116, 791–799 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chu, M. Y. and Fischer, G. A. Biochem, Pharmac., 17, 753–760 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Herberman, R. B. and Aoki, T. J. exp. Med., 136, 94–111 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin, S. T. and Martin, W. J. Int. J. Cancer, 15, 650–664 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gomard, E., Leclerc, J. C. and Levy, J. P. Nature, 250, 671–673 (1974).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Greenberg, A. H. and Playfair, J. H. L. Clin. exp. Immun., 16, 99–110 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Herberman, R. B., Nunn, M. B. and Lourin, D. H. Int. J. Cancer, 16, 216–229 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin, W. J. and Martin, S. T. Nature, 249, 564–565 (1974).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lamon, E. W., Whitton, H. D., Skurzak, H. N., Andersson, B. and Liden, B. J. Immun., 115, 1288–1294 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blair, P. B., Lane, M. A. and Mar, P. J. Immun., 113, 606–609 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kiessling, R., Petryanyi, G., Klein, F. and Wigzell, H. Int. J. Cancer, 15, 933–940 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kiessling, R., Petryanyi, G., Klein, F., and Wigzell, H., Int. J. Cancer, 17, 275–281 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Maramatsu, T., Nathenson, S. G., Boyse, E. A. and Old, L. J. J. exp. Med., 137, 1256–1261 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Forbes, J. T., Yoshinobu, N. and Smith, R. T. J. exp. Med., 141, 1181–1186 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics and Immunology, Manitoba Institute of Cell Biology, 700 Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg, Canada, R3E 0V9

    A. H. GREENBERG

  2. Department of Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

    M. GREENE

Authors
  1. A. H. GREENBERG
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. GREENE
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GREENBERG, A., GREENE, M. Non-adaptive rejection of small tumour inocula as a model of immune surveillance. Nature 264, 356–359 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/264356a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/264356a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing