Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Cell surface design

Abstract

CONSIDERATIONS of membrane fluidity (see refs 1–5) have often involved schematic representations of the cell plasma membrane and underlying cytoskeletal structures3–5. But, although intended to show how microtubules, microfilaments and so on might interfere with the mobility of membrane components, such models have not been drawn to scale. Usually microtubules and microfilaments seem much smaller than the plasma membrane, whereas the reverse is true. Thus, it has not been possible to evaluate fully the relative importance of plasma membrane and cytoskeleton in influencing cell surface dynamics. I have therefore tried to draw these various elements to scale. Since the data come from heterogeneous sources (fibroblasts, muscle cells, amoeba, plant cells, epithelial cells and lymphocytes) it is clear that the organisation of the various structures represented here can only be hypothetical and does not correspond to a known structure in a given cell type.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singer, S. J., A. Rev. Biochem., 43, 805–833 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Perspectives in Membrane Biology (edit. by Estrada-O, S., and Gitler, C.), (Academic Press, London, 1974).

  3. Nicolson, G. L., Biochim. biophys. Acta, 457, 57–108 (1976); 458, 1–71 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Edelman, G. M., Science, 192, 218–226 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Raff, M. C., Scient. Am. 234, 30–39 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Loor, F., in B and T Cells in Immune Recognition (edit. by Loor, F.,and Roelants, G. E.), (John Wiley, New York, in the press).

  7. Caspar, D. L. D., Adv. Protein Chem., 18, 37–121 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Helper, P. K., and Palevitz, B. A., A. Rev. Pl. Physiol, 25, 309–362 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pollard, T. D., and Weihing, R. R., C. R. C. Crit. Rev. Biochem., 2, 1–65 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mooseker, M. S., and Tilney, L. G., J. Cell Biol., 67, 725–743 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Young, M., King, M. V., O'Hara, D. S., and Molberg, P. J., Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol, 37, 65–76 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LOOR, F. Cell surface design. Nature 264, 272–273 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/264272a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/264272a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing