Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Role of stimulus environment and duration of processing in long term memory

Abstract

A MAJOR concern of current memory research is to identify how information is encoded and transferred from short term memory (STM) to long term memory (LTM)1,2. It has been reasoned that while an item remains in STM, it can be maintained through rehearsal; as a consequence, the corresponding LTM trace is built up. Thus, one may postulate that the adequacy of an item's registration in LTM is a positive function of the length of its stay in STM. Such a mechanical and simplistic account of memory has been challenged by a series of experiments which showed that when short term storage times were measured, these times did not predict long term retention3,4. We report here an experiment which manipulated the processing time as well as the processing context and showed that the processing time had differential effects, sometimes beneficial, sometimes harmful, and sometimes neutral, on an item's long term retention, depending in which type of processing context the item was embedded. Such results argue for a perceiver–environment interactive theory of memory.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Waugh, N. C., and Norman, D. A., Psychol. Rev. 72, 89–104 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shiffrin, R. M., and Atkinson, R. C., Psychol. Rev., 76, 179–193 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Craik, F. I. M., and Watkins, M. J., J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav., 12, 599–607 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Woodwar, A. E., Bjork, R. A., and Jongeward, R. H., J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav., 12, 608–617 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Neisser, L., and Seller, H. K., Br. J. Psychol., 56, 349–358 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Posner, M. L., and Konick, A. E., J. Exp. Psychol., 72, 221–231 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Watkins, O. C., and Watkins, M. J., J. exp. Psychol., Hum. Learn. Mem., 1, 442–452 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

TZENG, O., COE, W. & HUNG, D. Role of stimulus environment and duration of processing in long term memory. Nature 264, 56–57 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/264056a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/264056a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing