Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Suckling mouse cataract agent is a helical wall-free prokaryote (spiroplasma) pathogenic for vertebrates

Abstract

THE suckling mouse cataract agent (SMCA) is a filterable organism originally isolated from a pooled extract of rabbit ticks (Haemaphysalis leporis-palustris) collected near Atlanta, Georgia in April 1961 (ref. 1). The agent grows to high titre in the eyes and brains when inoculated intracerebrally into newborn mice in which it induces cataract, uveitis and chronic brain infection1–3. SMCA has also been grown to high titre in embryonated hen's eggs, in which it produces a lethal infection in 4–9 d (ref. 1). The agent has not been grown in tissue culture or in artificial media, but growth in a rabbit lens organ culture has been reported4. Stained SMCA-infected tissues failed to show the presence of rickettsiae and, as a result of such negative inferences and other characteristics of the agent3–5, it was considered to be a candidate slow virus6. Within the past few years however, ultrastructural and biological studies showed that a wall-free prokaryote was consistently associated with the acute and chronic disease in mice and with lethality in chick embryos7,8. Although the agent resembled mycoplasmas morphologically, it differed from them in its apparent non-cultivability on conventional mycoplasma medium. We now report that the organism associated with the suckling mouse cataract syndrome is a prokaryote similar to the spiroplasmas—a group of mycoplasmas known previously only from plants and insects.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clark, H. F., J. infect. Dis., 114, 476–487 (1964); Prog. Med. Virol., 18, 307–322 (1974).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, H. F., and Karzon, D. T., Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med., 131, 693–696 (1969).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Elizan, T. S., Fabiyi, A., and Clark, H. F., Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med., 139, 51–55 (1972).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fabiyi, A., Elizan, T. S., and Pounds, J. E., Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med., 136, 88–91 (1971).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwartz, J., and Elizan, T. S., Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med., 141, 699–704 (1972).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hotchin, J., Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immun., 40, 33–43 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zeigel, R. F., and Clark, H. F., Infect. Immun., 9, 430–443 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bastardo, J. W., Ou, D., and Bussell, R. H., Infect. Jmmun., 9, 444–451 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, R. E., and Worley, J. F., Phytopathology, 63, 403–408 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, R. E., Worley, J. F., Whitcomb, R. F., Ishijima, T., and Steere, R. L., Science, 176, 521–523 (1972).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, T. A., and Liao, C. H., Science, 188, 1015–1017 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Williamson, D. L., and Whitcomb, R. F., Science, 188, 1018–1020 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cole, R. M., Tully, J. G., Popkin, T. J., and Bové, J. M., J. Bact., 115, 367–386 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Saglio, P., et al., Int. J. Syst. Bact., 23, 191–204 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Whitcomb, R. F., Tully, J. G., Bové, J. M., and Saglio, P., Science, 182, 1251–1253 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Whitcomb, R. F., Williamson, D. L., Rosen, J., and Coan, M., Colloques Inst. natn. Sante Rech. Med. Paris, 33, 275–282 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Markham, P. G., et al., Ann. appl. Biol., 78, 49–57 (1974).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Williamson, D. L., and Whitcomb, R. F., Colloques Inst. natn. Sante Rech. Med. Paris, 33, 283–290 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Malogolowkin, Ch., Genetics, 43, 274–286 (1958).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tully, J. G., Whitcomb, R. F., Bové, J. M., and Saglio, P., Science, 182, 827–829 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cole, R. M., Tully, J. G., and Popkin, T. J., Colloques Inst. natn. Sante Rech. Med. Paris, 33, 125–132 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pickens, E. G., Gerloff, R. K., and Burgdorfer, W., J. Bact., 95, 291–299 (1968).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

TULLY, J., WHITCOMB, R., WILLIAMSON, D. et al. Suckling mouse cataract agent is a helical wall-free prokaryote (spiroplasma) pathogenic for vertebrates. Nature 259, 117–120 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/259117a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/259117a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing