Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Claim that two human linkage groups carry different loci for GPT and LDH withdrawn

Abstract

CHEN and Giblett1 have reported the occurrence of genetic polymorphism for human red cell glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT; EC 2.6.1.2). The usual phenotypes of red cell GPT (that is, GPT 1, 2-1 and 2) could be identified on cellogel by adapting the starch gel electrophoretic method of Chen and Giblett to cellogel (Fraser et al., unpublished). When a buffer system which separates the human and Chinese hamster forms is used, however, the isozyme patterns formed by fibroblasts were found to be distinctly different from those by red cells. We have employed the fibroblast isozymes as markers in human gene linkage studies using man–Chinese hamster somatic cell hybrids and have reported that the enzyme with GPT activity is probably a tetramer determined by two genes named GPT B and GPT C located on different chromosomes and linked to LDH B and LDH A respectively2.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen, S. H., and Giblett, E. R., Science, 173, 148 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Someren, H. van., Meera Khan, P., Westerveld, A., and Bootsma, D., Nature. new. Biol., 240, 221 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

VAN SOMEREN, H., KHAN, P., WESTERVELD, A. et al. Claim that two human linkage groups carry different loci for GPT and LDH withdrawn. Nature 249, 279–280 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1038/249279a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/249279a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing