Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Effects of Interrupted Light on Plant Disease

Abstract

RESULTS of experiments with scab disease on MM 109 apple rootstock shoots showed a marked lack of reproducibility, even when done in a glasshouse with some control of light and humidity as well as temperature (the mean visible light intensity was controlled to 1,300 ± 200 cal per cm2 per month1, ambient temperatures to 20 ± 2° C during the day and 15 ± 2° C at night with corresponding relative humidities of 70% ± 5% minimum and 90% ± 5% maximum). The disease system seemed to be very susceptible to residual fluctuations in the environment. Although this situation could be partly attributed to mechanical failures, examination of results and sunlight radiation records collected over a period of years indicated that erratic and short reductions in sunlight intensity, due to small cumulus clouds passing during the end of the first week after infection, could account for a considerable part of the irregularity. This study, though stimulated by previous observations on apple scab disease, was done with Venturia inaequalis and Padosphaera leucotricha on MM 109 apple rootstock shoots, and strawberry latent ring-spot virus on cucumber plants, in order to investigate the influence of interrupted light on plant disease generally.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hignett, R. C., Lab. Practice, 21, 433 (1972). (Erratum: substitute 12 V, 1.5 W zener diode for photodiode.)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kirby, A. H. M., and Frick, E. L., Ann. appl. Biol., 51, 61 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirkham, D. S., J. gen. Microbiol., 16, 360 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kirkham, D. S., and Hignett, R. C., Third Long Ashton Symp. 1971 (edit. by Byrde, R. J. W., and Cutting, C. V.), 55 (Academic, London, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kirkham, D. S., and Hignett, R. C., Nature, 225, 388 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, M. A., and Kennedy, B. W., Phytopathology, 60, 723 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Olsson, R., Physiol. Pl., 27, 9 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sackston, W. E., and Sheppard, J. W., Can. J. Bot., 51, 23 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackson, D. I., and Field, R. J., Ann. Bot., 36, 525 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith, D. R., and Langhans, R. W., Bull. 194, New York State Flower Growers Inc. (1962).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KIRKHAM, D., HIGNETT, R. & ORMEROD, P. Effects of Interrupted Light on Plant Disease. Nature 247, 158–160 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1038/247158a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/247158a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing