Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Are Large Time Differences in Meteorite Formation Real?

Abstract

IN recent years two types of cosmochronological dating have been interpreted to indicate that there are large time intervals, a few times 107 yr, between the formation of various meteorite samples. For example, extrapolation backwards along isochrons in seven basaltic achondrites led Papanastassiou and Wasserburg1 to establish a ‘standard’ initial 87Sr/86Sr ratio of 0.69898±0.00003 (BABI≡‘basaltic achondrite best initial’). Similar isochrons in another basaltic achondrite, Angra dos Reis, led, however, to an initial ratio of 0.69884±0.0004 (ADOR≡‘Angra dos Reis’)2. The difference between these two values is attributed to the accumulation of different amounts of the 87Sr decay product of 87Rb. If this reflects a difference in the times of fractionation between Rb and Sr in the meteoritic material, then the time interval is 14×106 yr. More recently, Tatsumoto, Knight, and Allegre3 found significant differences in the radiogenic 207Pb/206Pb ratios in Angra dos Reis and in two other basaltic achondrites, the value for Angra dos Reis being 0.6197 and the average of the other two being 0.6081. These nuclides result from the decay of 235U and 238U. If the differences are attributed to different times for the events of lead–uranium fractionation in the meteoritic materials, then the indicated time interval is 27×106 yr.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Papanastassiou, D. A., and Wasserburg, G. J., Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 5, 361 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Papanastassiou, D. A., thesis, CalTech (1970).

  3. Tatsumoto, M., Knight, R. J., and Allegre, C. J., Science, N.Y., 180, 1279 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Scalo, J. M., and Ulrich, R. K., Astrophys. J. (in the press).

  5. Hoyle, F., and Fowler, W. A., Nature, 241, 384 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Colgate, S. A., Astrophys. J. Lett., 181, 53 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Colgate, S. A., Astrophys. J. (in the press).

  8. Reeves, H., Astr. Astrophys., 19, 215 (1972).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Spitzer, jun., L., Diffuse Matter in Space (Interscience, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spitzer, jun., L., in Nebulae and Interstellar Matter (edit. by Middlehurst, B. M., and Aller, L. H.) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Truran, J. W., and Cameron, A. G. W., Astrophys. Space Sci., 14, 179 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cameron, A. G. W., Icarus, 18, 407 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cameron, A. G. W., Space Sci. Rev. (in the press).

  14. Hohenberg, C. M., Geochim. cosmochim. Acta, 34, 185 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CAMERON, A. Are Large Time Differences in Meteorite Formation Real?. Nature 246, 30–32 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/246030a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/246030a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing