Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Anencephaly and Spina Bifida: a Possible Example of Cytoplasmic Inheritance in Man

Abstract

ANENCEPHALY, spina bifida and related midline neurological defects are among the commonest severe congenital malformations in man for which a specific aetiology is still unknown. The deformities frequently occur together or in close relatives and, although their prevalence rates vary widely in different populations1 and have shown impressive secular trends within populations2, the rates are highly correlated, a fact which suggests a common aetiology. There is a well established recurrence risk of 4–5 per cent following the birth of the first affected child in a sibship, and for this reason a genetic aetiology has long been considered likely. No evidence for increased parental consanguinity has been found, and polygenic inheritance has in the past usually been accepted as the most satisfactory explanation for the known facts3. In 1968, however, Yen and MacMahon concluded that the recurrence risk for anencephaly and spina bificla could not be genetically determined because in none of 105 twin pairs taken from their own studies and other consecutive series in the literature was concordance for either deformity observed4. Furthermore, these authors noted that the recurrence risk for maternal half-siblings appeared to be as great as that for full siblings, an observation which they felt was inconsistent with genetic determination. As an alternative hypothesis, Yen and MacMahon suggested that the recurrence risk, variation in population frequencies and observed secular trends may all be attributable to an unidentified environmental factor. The twin data are, however, as difficult to reconcile with environmental causation as they are with either monogenic or polygenic Mendelian inheritance, because individual variation in the observed response to external teratogenie influences, be they environmental or maternal, must also arise, at least in part, from genetic differences in exposed foetuses. In either case, a high concordance rate might be expected among identical twins.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stevenson, A. C., Johnson, H. A., Stewart, M. I. P., and Golding, D. R., Bull. World Health Org., 34, 1 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Naggan, L., Amer. J. Epidem., 89, 154 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carter, C. O., Laurence, K. M., and David, P. A., Dev. Med. Child Neurol., 9, 30 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yen, S., and MacMahon, B., Lancet, ii, 623 (1968).

  5. Falconer, D. S., Ann. Hum. Genet., 29, 51 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Falconer, D. S., Ann. Hum. Genet., 31, 1 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carter, C. O., David, P. A., and Laurence, K. M., J. Med. Genet., 5, 81 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stern, C., Principles of Human Genetics (2nd edition), 533 (W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wagner, R. P., Science, 163, 1026 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Williamson, E. M., J. Med. Genet., 2, 161 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carter, C. O., and Fraser Roberts, J. A., Lancet, i, 306 (1967).

  12. Emery, A. E. H., University of Edinburgh Inaugural Lecture No. 35 (April 29, 1968) (T. and A. Constable, Ltd, Edinburgh).

  13. Allen, G., Prog. in Medical Genet., 4, 242 (1965).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zuelzer, W. W., Beattie, K. M., and Reisman, L. E., Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 16, 38 (1964).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kennedy, J. F., and Donahue, R. P., Lancet, i, 754 (1969).

  16. Nance, W. E., Davies, J., and Chazen, E., Clin. Res., 17, 316 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Storrs, E. E., and Williams, R. J., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 60, 910 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Penrose, L. S., J. Ment. Defic. Res., 1, 4 (1957).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sonneborn, T. M., in Heritage from Mendel (edit. by Brink, R. A.), 375 (Univ. Wise. Press, Madison, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Curtis, A. S. G., Arch. Biol. (Liège), 76, 523 (1965).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

NANCE, W. Anencephaly and Spina Bifida: a Possible Example of Cytoplasmic Inheritance in Man. Nature 224, 373–375 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/224373a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/224373a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing