Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Molecular Theory of Odour

Abstract

ACCORDING to Ruzicka's theory1 the character of an odoriferous substance is determined by its molecular shape, while the osmophoric group only causes variations in this character. The obvious importance of the spatial arrangement of the molecule of an odoriferous substance has caused the lock and key idea—established by Fischer in respect to the action of enzymes2—to be applied to the odoriferous substances and their perceptors3. Amoore4 suggested, with his stereochemical theory of olfaction, seven differently constructed perceptors in which those corresponding kinds of odoriferous substances all with a similar odoriferous character should fit the perceptor. Shallenberger and Acree5 maintained that two hydrogen-bond formers have to be present at a specific distance apart in a molecule if it is to have a sweet taste.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ruzicka, L., Chemiker Z., 44, 93, 129 (1920).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fischer, E., Ber., Deutsch. Chem. Ges., 27, 2992 (1894).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nerdel, F., and Spaeth, I., Angewandte Chemie, 63, 545 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Amoore, J. E., Nature, 212, 271 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shallenberger, R. S., and Acree, T. E., Nature, 216, 480 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Briegleb, G., Elektronen-Donator-Aceptor-Komplexe (Springer, Berlin, 1961).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Bloom, G., Z. Zellforsch., 41, 89 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brettschneider, H., Anatomischer Anzeiger, 105, 194 (1958).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Corey, R. B., and Pauling, L., Proc. Intern. Wool Textile Res. Conf., Australia 1955, B, 249.

  10. Hensel, H., Allg. Sinnesphysiologie, 289 (Springer, Berlin, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moncrieff, R. W., Manufacturing Chemist and Manufacturing Perfumer, 14, 175 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

RANDEBROCK, R. Molecular Theory of Odour. Nature 219, 503–505 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1038/219503a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/219503a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing