Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Methods for showing Distinctness and aiding Identification of Critical Groups in Taxonomy and Ecology

Abstract

IN recent studies of critical groups in the genus Satyrium Sw. (Orchidaceae), specimens have been grouped on the basis of numerically expressed properties, using the homogeneity function1 for pair-comparisons, followed by group average linkage clustering2. This results in a dendrogram such as that shown by the solid lines in Fig. 1. When restricted to pair-comparisons (as is necessary for samples3), the heterogeneity function for two-state and quantitative data reduces to a modulus generally similar to those of Cain and Harrison4, Colless5 and others. Usually only the links selected by the clustering system are shown in the dendrogram. For checking on the intermediate nature of some members in the present work, it was found helpful to include values for some of the other relationships in the closing stages of each study. For example, the dashed line in Fig. 1 helps to show that group B is nearly intermediate between groups A and C.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hall, A. V., Nature, 214, 830 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lance, G. N., and Williams, W. T., Nature, 212, 218 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hall, A. V., J. S. African Bot., 33, 185 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cain, A. J., and Harrison, G. A., Proc. Zool. Soc., 131, 85 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Colless, D. H., Syst. Zool., 16, 6 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sneath, P. H. A., Twelfth Symp. Soc. Gen. Microbiol., 289 (1962).

  7. Hall, A. V., J. S. African Bot., Suppl. 5, 1 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher, R. A., Ann. Eugen., 7, 179 (1936).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HALL, A. Methods for showing Distinctness and aiding Identification of Critical Groups in Taxonomy and Ecology. Nature 218, 203–204 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1038/218203a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/218203a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing