Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Structural Basis of Quantitative Variation in Nuclear DNA

Abstract

RECENT surveys show that variation in the amount of nuclear DNA, quite independently of change in chromosome number, is frequently associated with the divergence and evolution of both plant and animal species1–10. The extent of such variation is often very great, particularly among the angiosperms. One of the many problems posed by these findings is the nature of the chromosome structural changes which give rise to the DNA variation. Two proposals have been put forward. The first is a differential polynemy, that is, a difference in the lateral multiplicity of DNA strands between chromosomes of different species4,9. While this proposal has many theoretical attractions there is, to date, no direct evidence in its favour. Indeed, Callan11 has adduced evidence which argues strongly against this view. The second possibility is that the nuclear DNA variation is caused by lengthwise incorporation or loss of chromosome segments such as result from duplication or deletion. Observations in Lolium1 and in Chironomus3 hybrids at pachytene of meiosis and in polytene nuclei, respectively, show that the chromosomes of species with different nuclear DNA contents differ in respect of segmental duplications. There are therefore good grounds for attributing at least part of the DNA variation to such duplications. The following work in Allium provides further evidence to support this view. What is more, it shows that segmental duplications can account entirely for the DNA changes observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. John, B., and Hewitt, G. M., Chromosoma, 20, 155 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Keyl, H. G., Naturwissenschaften, 51, 46 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Keyl, H. G., Chromosoma, 17, 139 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin, P. G., and Shanks, R., Nature, 211, 650 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin, P. G., Exp. Cell Res., 44, 84 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bees, H., Cameron, F., Hazarika, M. H., and Jones, G. H., Nature, 211, 828 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kees, H., and Jones, G. H., Heredity, 22, 1 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rees, H., and Hazarika, M. H., in Chromosomes Today, 11 (in the press).

  9. Rothfels, K., Sexsmith, E., Heimburger, M., and Krause, M. O., Chromosoma, 20, 54 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sunderland, H., and McLeish, J., Exp. Cell Res., 24, 541 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Callan, H. G., J. Cell Sci., 2, 1 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

REES, H., JONES, R. Structural Basis of Quantitative Variation in Nuclear DNA. Nature 216, 825–826 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/216825b0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/216825b0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing