Abstract
ALTHOUGH it is almost 100 yr since the original report of Fritsch and Hitzig1, many of the effects of direct current stimulation (polarization) of the surface of motor cortex on cellular activity remain unclear. Electrophysiological research has shown that surface anodal polarization increases while surface cathodal polarization decreases the rate of discharge of cortical cells2–5. These results have been interpreted in terms of a model developed to explain the effects of direct current applied extracellularly on isolated nerve terminals6,7. In its simplest form, increases and decreases in discharge rate have been related to polarization induced displacements in membrane potential of cells subjected to a longitudinal potential gradient8–12. Presumably some fraction of diffuse extracellular applied current enters areas of superficial membrane close to the focal polarizing electrode. The chief effect of this current, however, is exerted as it leaves from distant parts of the excitable membrane. Accordingly, in the cortex, a surface anode provides inward current as it enters superficial dendritic regions of vertically oriented cells which subtend several cortical layers. At the same time the anode generates an outward depolarizing current as it passes out through deep-lying areas of excitable membrane in the soma or axon–hillock region of the cell. The sequence of events is presumably reversed when a surface cathode is used.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fritsch, G., and Hitzig, E., Arch. Anat. Physiol. wiss. Med. Leitzig, 37, 300 (1870).
Asanuma, H., and Ishikawa, T., Kobe J. Med. Sci., 5, 75 (1960).
Burns, B. D., J. Physiol., 125, 427 (1954).
Calvet, J., and Scherrer, J., C.R. Acad. Sci., 252, 2297 (1961).
Mollica, A., and Rossi, G. F., Arch. Fisiol., 54, 219 (1954).
Maruhashi, J., Mizuguchi, K., and Tasaki, I., J. Physiol., 117, 129 (1952).
Murray, R. W., J. Physiol., 134, 408 (1956).
Crutzfeldt, O. D., Fromm, G. H., and Kapp, H., Exp. Neurol., 5, 436 (1962).
Gorman, A. L. F., J. Neurophysiol., 29, 547 (1966).
Hern, J. E. C., Langren, S., Phillips, C. G., and Porter, R., J. Physiol., 73, 161 (1962).
Landau, W. M., Bishop, G. H., and Clare, M. H., J. Neurophysiol., 28, 1206 (1965).
Purpura, D. P., and McMurtry, J. G., J. Neurophysiol., 28, 166 (1965).
Colonnier, M. L., Brain and Conscious Experience, 1 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1966).
Eccles, J. C., Kostyuk, P. G., Schmidt, R. F., J. Physiol., 162, 138 (1962).
Landau, W. M., Bishop, G. H., and Clare, M. H., J. Neurophysiol., 27, 788 (1964).
Gorman, A. L. F., Exp. Neurol., 17, 344 (1967).
Araki, T., and Otani, T., J. Neurophysiol., 18, 472 (1955).
Krnjevič, K., Ranvič, M., and Stranghan, D. W., J. Physiol., 184, 49 (1966).
Phillips, C. G., Quart. J. Exp. Physiol., 41, 70 (1956).
Sugaya, E., Goldring, S., and O'Leary, J. L., Electroence ph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 17, 661 (1964).
Creutzfeldt, O. D., Watanabe, S., and Lux, H. D., Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2D, 1 (1966).
Li, C. L., and Chou, S. N., J. Cell. Comp. Physiol., 60, 1 (1962).
Creutzfeldt, O. D., Lux, H. D., and Watanabe, S., The Thalamus, 209 (Columbia University Press, New York, 1966).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
GORMAN, A. Surface versus Intracellular Polarization of Cortical Cells. Nature 216, 288–289 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/216288a0
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/216288a0
This article is cited by
-
Effect of electrodermal stimulation of a limb on unit responses in the motor cortex
Neuroscience Translations (1969)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.