Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Loss of Neural Inductive Capacity of the Chick Primary Organizer by Treatment with Histone and its Restoration by Follicle-stimulating Hormone

Abstract

THERE is some evidence that histones inhibit synthesis of DNA-dependent RNAs and thereby regulate genetic activity1–3. If this is so they should influence embryonic development by interfering with the differential expression of genetic activity. The effects of calf thymus histone fractions on the development of the chick embryos seem to depend on the stage chosen for treatment while those of poly-L-lysine do not4,5. Such effects are presumably caused by histones complexing with cytoplasmic molecules such as those concerned in embryonic inductions which appear in a sequential order during development6.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huang, R. C., and Bonner, J., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 48, 1216 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barr, G. C., and Butler, J. A. V., Nature, 199, 1170 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Allfrey, V. G., Littau, V. G., and Mirsky, A. E., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 49, 414 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sherbet, G. V., J. Embryol. Exp. Morph., 16, 159 (1966).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sherbet, G. V., in Histones, Their Role in the Transfer of Genetic Information Ciba Found. Study Group, 24 (J. & A. Churchill, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sherbet, G. V., Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 16, 89 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Waddington, C. H., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., B, 221, 179 (1932).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sherbet, G. V., J. Embryol. Exp. Morph., 11, 227 (1963).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sherbet, G. V., and Mulherkar, L., Roux. Arch. Entwickl.-Mech., 155, 701 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sherbet, G. V., Naturwissenschaften, 20, 471 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lakshmi, M. S., and Sherbet, G. V., Naturwissenschaften, 40, 501 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sherbet, G. V., and Lakshmi, M. S., Experientia (in the press).

  13. Sherbet, G. V., and Mulherkar, L., Roux. Arch. Entwickl.-Mech., 154, 506 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SHERBET, G., LAKSHMI, M. Loss of Neural Inductive Capacity of the Chick Primary Organizer by Treatment with Histone and its Restoration by Follicle-stimulating Hormone. Nature 215, 1089–1090 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/2151089a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2151089a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing