Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Natural and Induced Changes in Chromosome Size and Mass in Meristems

Abstract

PIERCE1, in 1937, claimed to have effected large changes in chromosome size in meristematic root tip cells of Viola conspersa after treating seedlings with different culture solutions. For example, he reports that in seedlings grown for 2 months in a culture solution with a large content of phosphate the chromosomes were 300 per cent larger by volume than in seedlings grown in a solution without phosphate. We think that his results provide the only direct evidence to show that changes in chromosome size may be induced by external environmental influences. The results pose two questions of particular interest. First, did the induced changes in chromosome volume reflect changes in chromosome mass or merely represent changes in the organization, for example, the coiling, of the chromosome material ? Second, were the induced changes associated with quantitative changes in chromosomal DNA and possibly, therefore, in genetic information ? This question is especially pertinent because variation in chromosome size between different individuals is, normally, positively correlated with changes in the quantity of nuclear DNA2,3. The following is a brief account of an experiment with seedlings of rye (Secale cereale, 2n = 14). The experiment completely confirms Pierce's results in showing that changes in chromosome size may readily be induced. The experiment also provides answers to the above questions in relation to chromosome mass and chromosomal DNA. In addition the experiment brings to light a variation in chromosome size, independent of the inducing treatments, that seems to be associated with the “ageing” of the seedlings.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pierce, W. P., Bull. Torrey Club, 64, No. 6 (1937).

  2. Darlington, C. D., Cytology (J. and A. Churchill Ltd., London, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rees, H., Cameron, F. M., Hazarika, M. H., and Jones, G. H., Nature, 211, 828 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Richards, B. M., The Cell Nucleus (Butterworth and Co. Ltd., London, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  5. McLeish, J., Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 158, 261 (1963).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lewis, K. R., and John, B., Chromosome Marker (J. and A. Churchill, Ltd., 1963).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BENNETT, M., REES, H. Natural and Induced Changes in Chromosome Size and Mass in Meristems. Nature 215, 93–94 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/215093a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/215093a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing