Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Differences in Normal Stress in Aqueous Solutions of Turbulent Drag Reducing Additives

Abstract

WHEN a fluid is in motion the normal stresses acting on the faces of a small fluid element which is instantaneously in the form of a cube are not in general equal. For example, in a Newtonian liquid the tensile stresses τxx, τyy, τzz acting on the cube faces perpendicular to orthogonal axes x, y, z are given by where p is pressure, μ is viscosity, and u, v w are the velocity components in the x, y, z directions. In the special case of flow through a long straight tube of uniform cross-section, however, u does not vary with x, and v and w are zero, so that then τxx = τyy = τzz = −p for a Newtonian liquid. For non-Newtonian liquids, on the other hand, such an equality may no longer obtain, even for this restricted type of flow. Thus for axial flow in the annular passage between two concentric tubes, of inner arid outer radius r1 and r2, respectively, the radial normal stress τrr may differ from the circumferential stress τθθ. For radial equilibrium or Thus measurements of the pressure difference can give an indication of the average magnitude of the normal stress difference τrr − τθθ.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoyt, J. W., and Fabula, A. G., paper presented at Fifth Symp. Naval Hydrodynamics, Bergen, Norway (Sept. 1964).

  2. Gadd, G. E., Nature, 206, 463 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Elata, C., and Poreh, M., paper issued by Hydraulics Laboratory, Israel Institute of Technology (1965).

  4. Elata, C., and Tirosh, J., Israel J. Technol., 3, 1 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. White, A., Hendon Coll. Technol. Res. Bull., No. 3 (1966).

  6. Oliver, D. R., Canad. J. Chem. Eng., 100 (April 1966).

  7. Gadd, G. E., Nature, 212, 874 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GADD, G. Differences in Normal Stress in Aqueous Solutions of Turbulent Drag Reducing Additives. Nature 212, 1348–1350 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/2121348a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2121348a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing