Abstract
IN a recent communication R. St. John Lambert and D. C. Rex1 imply that the palaeontological evidence is insufficient for any claim to be made that Lower Cambrian strata are exposed in the Malvern Hills. Whereas there is some doubt concerning the presence there of Middle Cambrian rocks, there is little doubt about the existence of Lower Cambrian. The earliest fossiliferous strata in Shropshire, which occur above the Wrekin Quartzite but at least 450 ft. below the Olenellid Callavia Limestone, were described by Cobbold2 as yielding two of the brachiopod species described by Matley3 from the Malvern. Quartzite of the Malverns, namely, Micromitra (Paterina) phillipsi (Holl) [olim Kutorgina cingulata auct.] and Obolella groomi Matley4. Later, a third brachiopod species known elsewhere only in the Shropshire O. groomi fauna, Micromitra (Paterina) rhodesi Cobbold, was collected by H. F. Metcalfe from the Malvern Quartzite in association with the previously recorded forms5. It is significant to learn that the “last major isotopic event in the Malvernian occurred 590 ± 20 m.y. ago”1, for this has an important bearing on the problem of the date of the base of the Cambrian. It would be of even greater interest to learn the isotopic age of the palaeontologically dated Lower-Cambrian Comley Sandstone glauconitic rocks from Shropshire which are being investigated by the Oxford group.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Lambert, R. St. J., and Rex, D. C., Nature, 209, 606 (1966).
Cobbold, E. S., Quart. J. Geol. Soc. Lond., 76 for 1920, 325 (1921).
Matley, C. A., Quart. J. Geol. Soc. Lond., 58, 137, 145 (1902).
Stubblefield, C. J., in, Rodgers, J., El Systema Cámbrico, su Paleogeografía, y el Problema de su Base: Tome 1, XX Congr. Geol. Internat., Mexico, 10, (1956).
Stubblefield, C. J., Sum. Prog. Geol. Surv. for 1935, 85 (1936).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
STUBBLEFIELD, C. The Malvern Lower Cambrian Strata. Nature 209, 1121 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/2091121a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2091121a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.