Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Spectrophotometric Identification of Feather Pigments in the Brown Leghorn Fowl

Abstract

BROWN Leghorn fowl show a strong sexual dimorphism in the plumage pigmentation, the female colouring being developed only in presence of the ovary whereas the male shades characterize intact or castrate bird alike. All feather tracts differ in some respects between the sexes ; the present discussion centres on the pectoral (breast) region which is salmon in the hen and black in the cock. In early studies of hormonal mechanisms in birds, Brown Leghorn cocks or capons with enforced feather regeneration were injected with an extract of human placentae, the preparation having been tested on the pullet oviduct for avian cestrogenic properties1. With this procedure the treated males developed a salmon female breast feathering which was indistinguishable in colour from that of the corresponding area in the normal hen. In later experiments synthetic œstrogens were employed, and here, it appeared, a pigmentation was produced resembling, but clearly darker than, the usual female. This shade was variously thought a matter of dosage2 ; a matter of dosage but transitory3 ; and as indicative of a genetic difference in the test fowl4. The last interpretation is not discounted, but it will be shown that two distinctly different modified breast feather pigments may follow from one single course of diethylstilboestrol treatment in one and the same Brown Leghorn capon. This is so because of the range of dosage requirements for feminization of the male breast feather tracts, the increase occurring in antero-posterior direction5. In favourable material, modified bars resembling the true female salmon were found in association with bars of a darker shade in feathers of more posterior location. This ‘darker’ shade, however, appeared more akin to the red which invades the breast tracts after thyroidectomy and which corresponds more closely with the red of the normal male saddle feather6. It seemed possible, therefore, that at certain levels the synthetic œstrogen produced effects comparable to thyroidectomy and that the darker pigmentation was in fact similar to if not identical with this male red. The foregoing inferences are now confirmed by Spectrophotometric differentiation of the normal female salmon from the normal red male and identification of each of these with modified breast feathers of the same capon following short-term œstrogen treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Juhn, M., and Gustavson, R. G., J. Exp. Zool., 56, 31 (1930).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, H., J. Exp. Zool., 109, 451 (1948).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Caridroit, F., and Regnier, V., Sixth World's Poultry Cong., Section 3, 12 (1936).

  4. Trinkaus, J. P., Proc. Third Conf. Biology of Normal and Atypical Pigment Cell Growth, 73 (Academic Press, New York, 1953).

  5. Juhn, M., Faulkner, G. H., and Gustavson, R. G., J. Exp. Zool., 58, 69 (1931).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenwood, A. W., and Blyth, J. S. S., Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., 49, 313 (1929).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Greenewalt, C. H., Brandt, W., and Friel, D. D., J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 50, 1005 (1960).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

JUHN, M. Spectrophotometric Identification of Feather Pigments in the Brown Leghorn Fowl. Nature 202, 507–508 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/202507a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/202507a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing