Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Influence of Ultrasound on Bone Mineral Metabolism

Abstract

THE problem of possible noxious effects of ultrasonic energy on calcified tissues is important because of its wide use in clinical and dental practice. The conditions of transmitting the ultrasound to bones and teeth and their surroundings are more complex than in soft tissues, being in a certain sense similar to those resulting from absorption of roentgen radiations in bones, causing, for example, selective overheating of bones due to increased absorption of ultrasonic energy and various interface effects on their surface. Coarsening of trabecular bone pattern, periosteal new-bone formation, circumscribed foci of bone sclerosis, localized bone necrosis, pseudocystic and cystic appearances and bone fractures were observed in various experiments on animals1,2. Not only were damaging effects on bone noted, but also on the dental germs after 3–4 W/cm2 ultrasonic energy9. The traumatic capacity of ultrasound in dentistry became the object of intense investigations from the middle 1960's because of the still wider use of ultrasonic dental cutting instruments in practice. Enamel defects and dyscrasias, loss of tooth structures, pink or yellow discolorations, mobile and fractured teeth and missing teeth were often correlated with the intensity and exposure time3,8. Thus, it can be concluded that there exists a real danger in application of ultrasound of too high an intensity and of prolonged exposure time.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Janes, J. M., Herrick, J. F., Kelly, P. J., and Paterson, L. F., Proc. Mayo Clin., 35, 663 (1960).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Janes, J. M., Herrick, J. F., Kelly, P. J., and Paterson, L. F., J. Bone Joint Surg., 44, A, 1299 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Knapp, M. J., and Bernier, J. L., J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 58, 50 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kolář, J., and Babický, A., Strahlentherapie, 109, 483 (1959).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kolář, J., and Babický, A., Nature, 192, 1297 (1961).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kolář, J., and Babický, A., Nature, 195, 1107 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kolář, J., Babický, A., and Vrabec, R., The Physical Injurious Agents and Bone (Pub. House, Czech. Acad. Sci., Prague) (in the press).

  8. Nielsen, A. G., and Kennedy, J. J., J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 56, 203 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schöniger, R., Stoma, 6, 52 (1913).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KOLÁŘ, J., BABICKÝ, A., KÁCLOVÁ, J. et al. Influence of Ultrasound on Bone Mineral Metabolism. Nature 202, 411–412 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/202411a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/202411a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing