Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A Simple Comparative Method of measuring Red Cell Viability

Abstract

A VARIETY of methods, including use of immunological or isotopic markers or the excretion-rate of products of hæmoglobin catabolism, have been used to estimate in vivo viability of red blood cells1. In measuring the viability of cells subjected to storage or other in vitro treatment, it is necessary to calculate survival using an independent measurement of dilution since the experimental cells may in part be rapidly lost2,3. The dilution volume, or red cell mass, of the recipient has been estimated indirectly from plasma volume and hæmatocrit determinations3 or directly by use of simultaneous or sequential injections of control red cells marked with a labelling system different from that used for the experimental cells2,4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strumia, M. M., Progress in Hematology, 1, 74 (1956). Root, W. S., Methods in Medical Research, 8, 1 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gibson, J. G., Aub, J. C., Evans, R. D., Peacock, W. C., Levine, jun., J. W., and Sack, T., J. Clin. Invest., 26, 704 (1947).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Strumia, M. M., Taylor, L., Sample, A. B., Colwell, L. C., and Dugan, A., Blood, 10, 429 (1955).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mollison, P. L., and Veall, N., Brit. J. Hæmat., 1, 62 (1955). Gibson, J. G., and Scheitlin, W. A., J. Lab. and Clin. Med., 46, 679 (1955). Donohue, D. M., and Finch, C. A., Vox Sang., 2, 369 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sterling, K., and Grey, S. J., J. Clin. Invest., 29, 1604 (1950). Read, R. C., New England J. Med., 250, 1021 (1954). Reilly, W. A., French, R. M., Lau, F. Y. K., Scott, K. G., and White, W. E., Circulation, 9, 571 (1954). Baker, C. H., and Remington, J. W., Amer. J. Physiol., 198, 906 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones, N. C. H., Mollison, P. L., and Robinson, M. A., Proc. Roy. Soc., 147 B, 476 (1957).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DOEBBLER, G., DWYER, R. & RINFRET, A. A Simple Comparative Method of measuring Red Cell Viability. Nature 195, 912–913 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/195912a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/195912a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing