Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Distribution-Free Interpretation of Spray-Drop Data

Abstract

SPRAY-DROP assay results do not always meet the Poisson-distribut ion test proposed by Williamson and Taylor1, even though they may be valid and the sole product of expensive measurements. Williamson and Taylor have described an appropriate method for interpreting the spray-drop results obtained by the technique of Williams and Backus2,3 for estimating the concentration of particles in a suspension. In this technique the unknown suspension is mixed with a suspension of polystyrene latex spheres in known concentration. The mixture is sprayed as a fine mist, and droplets are collected on specimen supports for examination by electron microscopy. For each droplet, the number of particles and the number of latex spheres observed are recorded. Counted for many droplets, these numbers constitute the raw data from which the concentration of particles in the unknown suspension is deduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williamson, K. I., and Taylor, W. B., Brit. J. App. Phys., 9, 264 (1958).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Williams, R. C., and Backus, R. C., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 71, 4052 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Backus, R. C., and Williams, R. C., J. App. Phys., 21, 11 (1950).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Luria, S. E., Williams, R. C., and Backus, R. C., J. Bact., 61, 179 (1951).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mood, A. M., “Introduction to the Theory of Statistics” (McGraw-Hill, 1950).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Finney, D. J., “Statistical Methods in Biological Assay” (Hafner, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

OPFELL, J. Distribution-Free Interpretation of Spray-Drop Data. Nature 186, 822–823 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1038/186822a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/186822a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing