Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Electron Affinity of Atomic Oxygen

Abstract

IN a recent communication, Morris and Schmeising1 applied the empirical extrapolation of ionization potentials of isoelectronic ions to determine the binding energy of the O− ion (the atomic oxygen electron affinity). By extending the order of the extrapolation through eight isoelectronic ions (to S7+), they find a slightly higher value, 1.044 eV., than is found from the more usual quadratic extrapolation. Stating that experimental determinations of the electron affinity have given results in unresolved conflict, Morris and Schmeising refer to three discordant values. A value of about 2.2 eV. was obtained by a thermodynamic evaluation of the probability of attachment of electrons to atomic oxygen at a hot filament, and from electron impact studies undertaken originally to determine the dissociation energies of molecular nitrogen and carbon monoxide. The value of 1.48 eV. is given by the optical threshold for photodetachment from O− by Smith and Branscomb. The value of 1.05 eV., which coincides with Morris and Schmeising's extrapolation, was obtained by Schüler and Bingel from the analysis of a certain discrete band spectrum thought to be due to a transition between two bound states of OH−. (For the original references see Morris and Schmeising1.) My purpose here is to resolve these apparent ambiguities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morris, D. F. C., and Schmeising, H. W., Nature, 181, 469 (1958).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hagstrum, H. D., J. Chem. Phys., 23, 1178 (1955).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Clarke, E. M., Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Laval, Quebec (1954), communicated to the author by L. Kerwin.

  4. Lagergren, C. R., Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Minnesota (1955) (see note by Branseomb, L., J. Chem. Phys. (in the press)).

  5. Barrow, R. F., and Downie, A. R., Proc. Phys. Soc., A, 69, 178 (1956). Barrow, R. F., Arkiv Fys., 11, 281 (1956).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schüler, H., and Michel, A., Z. Naturforsch., 11a, 403 (1956). Michel, A., Z. Naturforsch., 12a, 887 (1957).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Branscomb, L. M., Smith, S. J., Burch, D. S., and Geltman, S., Phys. Rev. (in the press).

  8. Branscomb, L. M., “Negative Ions” in “Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics”, 9 (Academic Press, New York, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BRANSCOMB, L. The Electron Affinity of Atomic Oxygen. Nature 182, 248–249 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1038/182248a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/182248a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing