Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Ultrasonic Absorption in Normal- and Para-Hydrogen

Abstract

SEVERAL years ago it was found by one of us, together with P. Mariens1 and L. Thys2, that the experimental values found for the ultrasonic absorption coefficient is much larger than the theoretical value computed by means of the equation of Kirchhoff–Stokes (viscosity and heat conductivity). This deviation was explained as due to the lag in the establishment of equilibrium between the rotational and the translational energy. Since these measurements were made, new and more accurate measurements have been carried out by one of us together with R. Vermaelen3, and also on heavy hydrogen. All those determinations were made by means of an acoustical interferometer, in which different quartz crystals and different resonator tubes were used. Later, the existence of this relaxation for the rotational energy was proved by dispersion measurements, respectively by E. S. Stewart, J. L. Stewart and J. C. Hubbard4. On the other hand, the absorption coefficients found by the use of the acoustical interferometer have been criticized by P. E. Krasnooshkin5 and more recently by J. F. W. Bell6. Their argument is that an excess of absorption should be caused by the non-uniform vibration of the crystal surface, which produces excitation of the transverse modes of resonance in the interferometer tube. This excess of absorption can be determined by plotting the observed absorption coefficient αobs as a function of the pressure p, whereby 0 is absorption coefficient corresponding to atmospheric pressure p0, and α1 is the parasite absorption coefficient). In order to check this theory, we have carried out a series of very accurate measurements (frequency = 500.0 kc./s.) as a function of pressure and temperature (liquid oxygen temperatures) in normal- and para-hydrogen and helium gas.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Itterbeek, A., and Mariens, P., Physica, 4, 609 (1937).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Itterbeek, A., and Thys, L., Physica, 5, 889 (1938).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Itterbeek, A., and Vermaelen, R., Physica, 9, 345 (1942).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart, E. S., Phys. Rev., 68, 231 (1945). Stewart, J. L., and Stewart, E. S., J. Acous. Soc. Amer., 20, 585 (1948). Stewart, E. S., Stewart, J. L., and Hubbard, J. C., Phys. Rev., 68, 231 (1945).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Krasnooshkin, P. E., Phys. Rev., 65, 190 (1944).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bell, J. F. W., Proc. Phys. Soc., B, 63, 958 (1950).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

VAN ITTERBEEK, A., VERHAEGEN, L. Ultrasonic Absorption in Normal- and Para-Hydrogen. Nature 167, 477–478 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1038/167477a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/167477a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing