Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Nuclear Resonance and Magnetic Field Changes of 1 in 106

Abstract

IT is well known1 that when a nuclear magnetic resonance signal is obtained in a rapidly rising magnetic field, the nuclei continue processing after resonance is passed. Their precessional frequency increases with the magnetic field, and while doing so forms beats with the exciting radio-frequency. These beats appear as ‘wiggles’ after passing the main resonance. In a perfectly homogeneous field, these wiggles die away exponentially at a rate determined by the relaxation time T22. T2 is related to the natural line-width by the relation T2 = 1/γΔH, where ΔH is the line-width and γ the gyromagnetic ratio of the nuclei being used. If the magnetic field is inhomogeneous by more than ΔH over the sample volume, say by ΔH, then the rate of decay of the wiggles is generally believed to be determined by the time, 1/γΔH. This has proved a limitation in the measurement of transverse relaxation times T2 10−3 sec., as for such measurements a magnetic field inhomogeneity of 0.003 gauss is required; and, hitherto, this requirement has not been satisfied. Torrey3 has proposed and used a method in which long relaxation times T2 can be studied in the presence of an inhomogeneous magnetic field. The observation of his phenomenon depends on maintaining the magnetic field at resonance, and is quite unrelated to the ‘wiggles’ experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bloembergen, Purcell and Pound, Phys. Rev., 73, 679 (1948).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobsohn, B. A., and Wangsness, R. K., Phys. Rev., 73, 942 (1948).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Torrey, H. C., Phys. Rev., 76, 1059 (1949).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GOODEN, J. Nuclear Resonance and Magnetic Field Changes of 1 in 106. Nature 165, 1014–1015 (1950). https://doi.org/10.1038/1651014a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1651014a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing