Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Early Human Embryos

Abstract

Rock and Hertig1 explicitly described their 7·5-day ovum (Mu—8020) as "implanted on" the endometrium; that is, this ovum has only just begun to embed itself and a large part of the ovum is still freely exposed in the uterine cavity. On the other hand, they referred to their older ova (including the 9·5-day ovum, Wi—8004) as "implanted within", "embedded in" the endometrium. In the limits of a short letter, I thus deliberately confined my comparison to "fully implanted" specimens, by which I mean specimens in which no part of the embryonic tissues is exposed freely to the uterine cavity. If completeness of endometrial epithelialization is to be the criterion determining whether an ovum is fully implanted or not, then my specimen is not so far advanced in this respect as the Wi—8004 ovum, in that no surface epithelialization has yet commenced in my specimen, but the embryonic tissues are separated from the uterine cavity by the maternal fibrinous elements of the operculum. This process of epithelialization evidently takes a considerable time, since it is not complete even in the 11·5- and 12·5-day Hertig-Rock ova2, by which time the "fully-implanted" ovum has undergone considerable advance in development beyond the stage shown in my specimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rock, J., and Hertig, A. T., Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 44, 973 (1942).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hertig, A. T., and Rock, J., Contrib. Embryol. Carnegie Inst. Wash., 29, No. 184, 127 (1941).

  3. Heuser, C. H., and Streeter, G. L., Contrib. Embryol. Carnegie Inst. Wash., 29, No. 181, 15 (1941).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DAVIES, F. Early Human Embryos. Nature 153, 684–685 (1944). https://doi.org/10.1038/153684c0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/153684c0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing