Abstract
THE view expressed by Howard in his interesting article on the elm tree1, that there are but two species represented in the United Kingdom "with perhaps nine or more hybrids or varieties", is no longer accepted by botanists. It is true that the common or English elm and the wych elm are the most widely-spread species and both are undoubtedly native. The wych elm, the correct name for which is Ulmus glabra Huds., occurs throughout the country, but the common elm is concentrated in the south, thins out in northern England and is probably only planted in Scotland. This species is now known as U. procera Salisbury, the Linnean name U. campestris being a nomen ambiguum2. Its distribution in the country is quite natural, and so far it has been recorded from the Continent only as a planted tree; the evidence strongly favours the view that it is endemic, in spite of the misgivings of earlier writers.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Howard, A. L., NATURE, 152, 636 (1943).
Melville, R., J. Bot., 76, 261 (1938).
Melville, R., J. Bot., 76, 185 (1938).
Melville, R., Proc. Linn. Soc., 151, 152 (1939).
Melville, R., J. Bot., 78. 181 (1940).
Melville, R., J. Bot., 77, 138 (1939).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MELVILLE, R. The British Elm Flora. Nature 153, 198–199 (1944). https://doi.org/10.1038/153198c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/153198c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.