Abstract
Experiments with social instigation or the omission of scheduled reinforcement show that serotonergic mechanisms may be involved in escalated aggression in animals. 5-HT1B receptor agonists have anti-aggressive effects in individuals who show moderate as well as high levels of aggression. The present study compared the effects of the 5-HT1B agonist anpirtoline (0.125–1.5 mg/kg) on (1) species-typical aggressive behavior in male mice, (2) aggression “instigated” or primed by prior exposure to the opponent, and (3) aggression heightened by “frustration” caused by omission of scheduled reinforcement. The effects of anpirtoline on species-typical behavior were also assessed after pretreatment with the 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist GR127935 (10 mg/kg). Anpirtoline, like other 5-HT1B agonists (CP-94,253, zolmitriptan), decreased both instigated and frustration-heightened aggression, while motor behavior was unaffected. The aggression-inhibiting effects of anpirtoline were blocked by pretreatment with GR127935. The current results indicate that the 5-HT1B receptor is critically involved in the modulation of escalated aggression.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
The development of valid experimental protocols that model clinically relevant, excessive levels of aggressive behavior is a continuing challenge for pre-clinical research on aggression (Miczek 2001). The leading neurobiological hypothesis attributes such intense aggressive behavior, often related to expressions of impulsivity, to a deficit in brain serotonin (Linnoila et al. 1983; Virkkunen et al. 1989; Coccaro 1989). An early example of this research strategy was the demonstration that mice would exhibit intense aggressive behavior after prolonged isolated housing, and this isolation-induced aggression is associated with lower serotonin turnover in the brainstem (Garattini et al. 1967). Long-standing concerns with the validity and reliability of isolation-induced aggression and its limited species generality prompt the search for alternate approaches (Brain 1975; Krsiak 1975). Similarly, correlation of aggressive behavior with a single tissue or CSF measurement of serotonin or its metabolite need to be reconciled with the anti-aggressive effects of agonist and antagonist treatment of specific serotonin receptor subtypes (Olivier et al. 1995; de Almeida et al. 2001).
The exposure of an experimental subject to a potential rival for a short time prior to the actual confrontation engenders intense levels of aggression, as originally described in mice (Lagerspetz 1969; Tellegen and Horn 1972). For example, mice, rats, and hamsters initiate attacks with very short latency and at high frequency when tested with an intruder in their home cage or in an unfamiliar locale after having been provoked previously by an opponent (Potegal 1992; Fish et al. 1999). Instigation or priming is specific for increasing aggressive behavior and does not activate locomotion, feeding, or sexual behavior (Lagerspetz and Hautojarvi 1967; Potegal and Tenbrink 1984; Potegal 1992). Even after removal of the instigating or priming stimulus, high levels of aggression persist in fish and rodents, presumably from increased “aggressive arousal” or “attack readiness” (Heiligenberg 1974; Potegal and Tenbrink 1984; Potegal 1992). At the neurochemical level, animals that have been instigated to fight are characterized by a long-lasting decrease in serotonin in hypothalamus and in medial prefrontal cortex (Payne et al. 1984; van Erp and Miczek 2000).
An exceptionally efficient approach to amplify aggression uses “frustrative non-reward” as the motivational process, operationally defined by omission or discontinuation of scheduled reinforcement (see Dollard et al. 1939; Amsel and Roussel 1952; Azrin et al. 1966; Thompson and Bloom 1966; Kelly 1974). Bursts of aggression can be observed after discontinuation of scheduled rewards in many different species such as fish, birds, rodents, monkeys, and humans (Thompson and Bloom 1966; Cherek and Pickens 1970; Caprara 1982; Evenden and Ryan 1996). For example, Azrin et al. (1966) used a procedure to quantify a pigeon's attack toward an immobilized target bird after the experimental subject's food-reinforced key pecking was extinguished. Individuals differ in the way they tolerate discontinuation of scheduled reinforcement, and an individual's “frustration tolerance” is postulated to be reflected in varying amounts of aggression (Cherek and Pickens 1970). The present experiments attempt to study extinction-induced aggression in mice, a species that has become of considerable interest because of developments in molecular genetics (Miczek et al. 2001). Whether or not heightened aggression resulting from discontinued reinforcement is characterized by a distinctive profile of serotonergic activity remains to be explored.
Activation and antagonism of several 5-HT receptor subtypes in the 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 families suppress aggressive behavior (Sanchez et al. 1993; de Almeida and Lucion 1994; Olivier et al. 1995; de Almeida and Lucion 1997; Miczek et al. 1998; de Almeida et al. 2001). Experimental deletion of the gene coding for the 5-HT1B receptor as well as pharmacological studies implicate this receptor subtype in aggressive behavior (Saudou et al. 1994; Mos et al. 1992). Agonists at postsynaptic 5-HT1B receptors, such as CP-94,253, zolmitriptan, and anpirtoline, produce remarkably specific inhibition of species-typical aggression and very intense and frequent aggressive behavior at doses that do not alter the remaining behavioral repertoire (Fish et al. 1999; de Almeida et al. 2001; Miczek and de Almeida 2001). At higher 5-HT1B receptor agonist doses sexual and alimentary behavior is suppressed and motor behavior stimulated (Hillegaart and Ahlenius 1998; Lee et al. 1998; Stenfors et al. 2000). Anpirtoline, a 5-HT1B agonist, has been shown to have a high affinity for 5-HT1B receptors (K(i)=28 nM) (Schlicker et al. 1992; Swedberg et al. 1992).
In order to assess the anti-aggressive effects of the 5-HT1B receptor agonist anpirtoline, we compared its effects on the species-typical display of aggressive behavior in mice to those on heightened levels of aggression caused by instigation by a male opponent (“social instigation-induced aggression”) or discontinuation of scheduled reinforcement (“frustration-induced aggression”). Based on studies with 5-HT1B receptor agonists such as CP 94,235 and zolmitriptan, anpirtoline was predicted to dose-dependently reverse the behavioral enhancement of aggression in both studies. Furthermore, we postulate that these anti-aggressive effects of anpirtoline are caused by the activation on 5-HT1B receptors as the anpirtoline effects were competitively antagonized by pretreatment with the 5-HT1B/D receptor antagonist GR127935.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
Adult male CFW mice (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA), weighing between 22–25 g on arrival, were housed as “residents” with females of the same strain in clear polycarbonate cages (28 ×17 ×14 cm). The floor of each cage was covered with wood chip bedding, and Purina rodent chow and water were freely available through the wire lid. Additional male CFW mice (n = 40) were housed in groups of 10 and served as stimulus animals. The subjects were allowed to acclimate to the laboratory environment for 7 days. All mice were housed in a room with controlled 22 ± 1°C temperature and 30–40% humidity on a 12:12 h photocycle. All procedures followed the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Research Council, 1996) and were approved by the Tufts University Animal Care and Use Committee.
Apparatus and Measurements
The behavior of the mice was recorded on videotape, using a low-lux video camera and a standard videocassette recorder. Aggressive and non-aggressive behaviors were measured by a trained observer using a custom-designed data acquisition system similar to that described earlier (Miczek 1982). The aggressive behaviors were defined and illustrated previously (Miczek and Donnell 1978) and included anogenital contact with the intruder, pursuit, sideways threat, bite, and tail rattle, as well as non-aggressive behaviors: grooming, walking, contact, and rearing. Inter- and intra-observer reliability for encoding these behaviors were calculated using the Spearman correlation coefficient and ranged from 0.95 for the duration of walking to 0.98 for the frequency of attack bites.
Drugs
Anpirtoline hydrochloride (6-chloro-2-[piperidinyl-4-thio] pyridine) was purchased from Tocris Cookson (Ballwin, MO) and dissolved in 0.9% saline. GR127935 (N-[4-meth- oxy-3-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)phenyl]-2-methyl-4’-(methyl-1,2,4-oxadiozol-3-yl)-[1,1-biphenyl]-4-carboxamide) was donated by Glaxo Research and Development Ltd. (London, England) and was suspended in 10% BCD (hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin) with the aid of sonication.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Experiment 1: Anpirtoline Effects on Species-typical Aggression by a Resident Toward an Intruder
According to previously established methods (Miczek and O'Donnell 1978), the females and pups were removed from the home cage before the aggressive confrontation, and an intruder was placed into the resident's home cage. Tests lasted for 5 minutes after the first attack, or for 5 minutes if no attack occurred. After the fifth or sixth confrontation with a male intruder in the resident's home cage, the rate of attack bites had stabilized at 20 bites. The mice were tested twice a week for aggression with a minimum of 72 h between each confrontation. All encounters were conducted between 1400 and 1900 h, and the behaviors were analyzed at a later date. After 10 confrontations, new intruders were used as stimulus animals.
Twelve adult male CFW mice were used to determine the effects of anpirtoline (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg) on species-typical levels of aggression. Doses of anpirtoline were administered in a counterbalanced sequence 15 minutes before the confrontation with a male intruder. The drug test was alternated with a vehicle test. Thereafter, the anpirtoline dose-effect determination was repeated after pre-treatment with GR127935 (10 mg/kg). GR127935 was administered 30 minutes prior to anpirtoline, and the tests were scheduled 15 minutes after the administration of anpirtoline.
Experiment 2: Anpirtoline Effects on Aggression after Social Instigation
Suppressed Aggression in Neutral Arena
After a stable level of fighting was confirmed in confrontations between the resident and an intruder in the resident's home cage, confrontations were scheduled in an unfamiliar “neutral” cage (Miczek and O'Donnell 1980). The neutral arena was a clear polycarbonate cage that was approximately 4 times as large as the standard home cage (30 × 33 × 46 cm) with unsoiled pine shavings covering the floor. The resident was moved from its home cage and placed into one corner of the neutral cage, and the stimulus opponent was placed in the opposite corner at the same time. As in the home cage, these confrontations were 5 minutes long after the first attack or were terminated after 5 minutes if no attack occurred. At the end of each test, the neutral cage was cleaned with 20% alcohol solution and the pine shavings were changed. The levels of aggression in the neutral cage were 40% lower than in the home cage, confirming previous observations (Miczek and O'Donnell 1980).
Instigation-heightened Aggression
Fourteen male mice were used in an experiment to engender very high levels of aggression caused by social instigation or provocation (Fish et al. 1999). Specifically, an experimentally naive male intruder was placed inside a protective cage, a clear perforated polycarbonate cylinder (18 × 6 cm), for 5 minutes in the center of the resident's home cage. The residents typically threatened the protected intruder and attacked the perforated cage. Thereafter, the resident was moved and confronted a stimulus opponent in a neutral cage for 5 minutes. Two confrontations with an opponent in a neutral cage were scheduled per week, one after instigation and the other without instigation. For each instigation procedure, a new naive male stimulus animal was placed inside the protective cage. The protective cage was cleaned after each test with 20% alcohol solution.
Experiment 3: Anpirtoline Effects on Extinction-heightened Aggression
Animals
Nine adult male CFW mice (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA), weighing 25–30 g, were housed in polycarbonate cages (28 ×17 × 14 cm). As before, additional male CFW mice were housed in groups of 10 (n = 30) in larger cages (44 × 24 × 14 cm), and these animals served as stimulus intruder mice.
Apparatus
The experimental set-up and conditioning procedure was identical to those described and illustrated previously (Miczek and de Almeida 2001). Briefly, at the beginning of each session, an experimental panel was inserted into the middle of the mouse cage and affixed to the side walls with two thumbscrews. The panel contained nose-poke sensors and stimulus lights on the left and right sides, with a fluid delivery cup and a house light in the center (all devices from Med Associates, St. Albans, VT). The fluid delivery cup was connected to a syringe pump. The devices in the panel as well as the pump were connected to an interface that in turn was controlled by a PC running Windows Med PC.
Procedure
During the initial two days, the procedure consisted of reinforcing each nose poke response with the delivery of 0.05 ml sucrose (10%) (Fixed Ratio, FR 1). In successive sessions, the FR requirement was increased gradually to 5. Thereafter, the sucrose solution was decreased from 10% to 8%, 6%, and eventually 4%. Acquisition of the nose-poke response occurred within minutes of the first experimental session in mice that had been restricted to fluid intake to 8 h per day and that had been exposed to sucrose in their drinking fluid previously. During the first 3 weeks, daily experimental sessions lasted 30 minutes, during the next 4 weeks 15 minutes, and finally 5 minutes.
When response rates were stable (i.e., <10% variation across three consecutive sessions), extinction sessions were scheduled twice a week. During the extinction session nose-poke responses were reinforced only three times. After the third reinforcement delivery, the number of nose pokes continued to be counted for a period of 5 minutes. During the non-extinction session (FR 5), nose poking was reinforced by deliveries of 4% sucrose solution for the entire daily 5-minute session.
Five minutes after the end of the extinction or non-extinction sessions, each resident mouse was tested for aggression with an intruder. The response panel was kept in the cage and a male intruder was placed into the resident's home cage. These confrontations were scheduled every other day, and the latency to the first attack bite and the frequency of attacks were measured for 5 minutes. The same behavioral acts and postures were analyzed as was described before. After three further confrontations (8th, 9th, and 10th confrontation), aggressive behavior was stable (i.e., less than 15% variation in two consecutive tests) and was not affected by sucrose self-administration (attack frequency 14.57 ± 1.17 after self-administering sucrose 4% vs. 18.44 ± 4.81 in the absence of self-administration). Thereafter, extinction and non-extinction tests were each conducted once a week.
Anpirtoline (0.25, 0.50, 1.0 mg/kg) or the saline vehicle was administered intraperitoneally 15 min before the experimental session with sucrose-reinforced responding. These doses of anpirtoline were selected based on previous findings of significant anti-aggressive effects (Miczek and de Almeida 2001). Aggression tests occurred 20 minutes after the injections of anpirtoline.
Data Analysis
All data from the experiments were analyzed using a one-way repeated measure analysis of variance, and when appropriate, Dunnett's post hoc tests were used with vehicle values as control. All data for the dose-effect of anpirtoline and antagonism with GR127935 experiments were analyzed using a one-way repeated measure analysis of variance, and when appropriate, Dunnett's post hoc tests were used with vehicle values as the common control. The effect of GR 127935 alone as compared with vehicle was analyzed using a paired t-test. The ED50 was defined as the dose of anpirtoline that produced a 50% reduction in behavior as compared with the baseline and was calculated using linear regression. Non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals were considered statistically different. The data for the instigation and extinction effects were also analyzed using a one-way repeated measure analysis of variance. The α level was set at 0.05.
RESULTS
Experiment 1
Effects of Anpirtoline on Species-typical Aggression
Anpirtoline significantly decreased the frequency of attack bites (F(4,11) = 37.75, p < .001), sideways threats (F(4,11) = 21.88, p < .001), and tail rattles (F(4,11) = 25.31, p < .001) at the 0.5 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg doses when compared with vehicle control (Figure 1 ). When administered alone, 10 mg/kg GR127,935 did not affect any aggressive behavior. When administered prior to anpirtoline, GR127,935 produced a significant rightward shift in the dose-effect curve for bite frequency (Figure 1). The ED50’s and CI95 for the effects of anpirtoline on the frequency of attack bites and sideways threats were 0.45 mg/kg (0.29, 0.69) and 0.64 mg/kg (0.33, 1.41), respectively. In the presence of GR127,935, the ED50 and CI95 for the effects of anpirtoline on attacks bites and sideways threats were 0.84 mg/kg (0.41,1.03) and 0.98 mg/kg (0.62, 1.16), respectively. In the presence of GR127,935, 0.5 to 2.0 mg/kg anpirtoline were necessary to decrease the frequency of sideways threats (F(5,11) = 15.04, p < .001). The frequency of bites (F(5,11) = 14.96, p < .001) and tail rattles (F(5,11) = 4.04, p < .003) were significantly decreased at the doses of 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg anpirtoline.
Neither the duration nor the frequency of non-aggressive behavioral elements such as walking, rearing, grooming and contact were affected by administration of anpirtoline (Table 1 ).
Experiment 2
Aggression in Neutral Cage and after Instigation
In com- parison to the level of aggressive behavior by the resident when confronting an intruder in the home cage, the frequency of attacks and sideways threats was significantly reduced from 19.9 ± 1.2 to 14.0 ± 2.0 (F(2,11) = 48.45, p < .001) and 24.6 ± 1.6 to 17.3 ± 2.2 (F(2,11) = 47.76, p < .001), respectively in the neutral cage. The latency to the first attack was significantly lengthened from 6.6 ± 1.82 in the home cage to 62.68 ± 16.64 sec in the neutral cage (t (28) = 23.16, p < .0001; Table 2 ). After instigating the resident mice with a male opponent for 5 min, all elements of aggressive behaviors showed a significant increase by 120–540%. The frequency of pursuits (F(2,11) = 10.08, p < .001), sideways threats (F(2,11) = 47.76, p < .001), attack bites (F(2,11) = 48.45, p < .001) and tail rattles (F(2,11) = 52.50, p < .001) were significantly increased in comparison with the level of fighting in the absence of instigation (Figure 2 ), top).
Among the elements of non-aggressive behaviors, only the duration of contact was significantly reduced after instigation (F(2,11) = 4.52, p < .023). Other behaviors such as grooming, rearing, and walking remained unaffected by the instigation procedure (Table 2).
Effects of Anpirtoline in Noninstigated Aggression
Anpirtoline (0.25–1.5 mg/kg) significantly reduced the frequency of attack bites (F(5,12) = 18.41, p < .001) when compared with vehicle group. The frequency of sideways threats (F(5,12) = 9.54, p < .001) and tail rattles were significantly decreased after administration of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mg/kg anpirtoline (Figure 2, bottom). None of the items that comprise non-aggressive motor activities were affected by administration of anpirtoline (Table 3 ).
Effects of Anpirtoline on Heightened Aggression after Instigation
Anpirtoline significantly reduced the frequency of attack bites (F(5,12) = 39.38, p < .001) and sideways threats (F(5,12) = 36.88, p < .001) across all doses studied when compared with vehicle group. The frequency of tail rattles was significantly decreased after 1.5 mg/kg anpirtoline (Figure 2, bottom).
None of the non-aggressive motor behaviors were affected by treatment with anpirtoline (Table 2).
Experiment 3
Aggression after Extinction (“Frustration”)
The mean frequency of attack bites (t(7) = 3.1, p < .02) and sideways threats (t(7) = 2.4, p < .05) in extinction tests were significantly increased when compared with non-extinction tests (Figure 3 , top). None of the elements of non-aggressive behavior such as walking, rearing, grooming, and contact showed any significant alteration in both tests (Table 4 .
Effects of Anpirtoline on Heightened Aggression after Extinction
Anpirtoline (0.25–1.0 mg/kg) significantly reduced the frequency of attack bites (F(3,24)=71.27, p < .001), sideways threats (F(3,24)=27.75, p < .001), and tail rattles (F(3,24)=13.18, p < .001) across all doses studied (Figure 3, bottom).
Anpirtoline (0.5–1.0 mg/kg) significantly increased the duration of contact after the extinction test (F(3,24) = 4.05, p < .018) and 0.25–0.5 mg/kg of anpirtoline decreased the duration of rearing after the non-extinction test (F(3,24) = 3.36, p < .035) when compared with group control. The other non-aggressive behaviors such as walking and grooming were not affected by anpirtoline in either the extinction or non-extinction tests (Table 4).
DISCUSSION
The currently developed experimental protocols successfully engender escalated levels of aggressive behavior in the mouse that approximate several behavioral features of clinical concern. In order to assess heightened aggression, the species-typical pattern of aggressive behavior by resident Swiss-Webster mice toward intruders served as the standard for comparison. This random bred strain of mice has been most frequently selected for psychopharmacological studies of aggression under controlled laboratory conditions (Valzelli et al. 1967; Krsiak 1979; Miczek et al. 2001). Both the social instigation protocol as well as the “frustration” procedure more than doubled the frequency of attacks and threats toward a stimulus opponent, and these experimental protocols proved repeatable over several months. In strains of mice such as DBA/2J, C57BL/6, and Balb/cJ in which many individuals exhibit low levels of aggressive behavior, the social instigation procedure engendered increased fighting in confrontations with intruders (Faccidomo et al., in preparation). The escalated levels of aggression in socially instigated or “frustrated” mice provided a direct test of the putative anti-aggressive effects of anpirtoline (Rilke et al. 2001). The potent and efficacious inhibition of heightened aggressive behavior by anpirtoline adds to the evidence from studies with CP 94,253 and zolmitriptan implicating the 5-HT1B receptor as a promising target for anti-aggressive medication (Fish et al. 1999; de Almeida et al. 2001).
Social instigation in the form of exposure to a protected male opponent in the resident's home cage generated very high levels of attacks, and this intense form of aggression has been postulated to involve high “aggressive arousal” (Potegal 1991). Similar procedures in laboratory rats and hamsters demonstrated significant increases specifically in aggressive behavior, but not in feeding or sexual behavior (Thor and Carr 1979; Thor and Flannelly 1979; Potegal 1991). In the present sample, the effect of instigation increased specifically the salient elements of the aggressive behavioral repertoire but did not extend to non-aggressive behavioral elements. Fish et al. (1999) have demonstrated that exposure to adult male mice increased aggression, whereas other stimuli such as a juvenile or a female mouse were insufficient to escalate the levels of aggression. Whereas no significant relationship between the magnitude of the instigation effect and an individual's non-instigated baseline level of aggression was apparent, the size of the escalation in aggression varied substantially across individuals, ranging from 120–540% above baseline. The source for these persistent individual differences remains to be determined. During the aggression tests, a high incidence of wounding in the intruders was observed, but it was not analyzed. It will also be interesting to learn whether or not the intensity of the instigation effect is related to other forms of escalated aggression.
After discontinuation of the scheduled delivery of sucrose, nearly all individuals in the present sample immediately showed bursts of operant responding and subsequently heightened aggression, and these rapid and high levels of aggression persisted during semi-weekly confrontations over several months. Earlier studies in pigeons and monkeys have demonstrated enhanced levels of aggression after discontinuation of scheduled reinforcement (Azrin et al. 1966; Cherek and Pickens 1970; Kelly 1974; Looney and Cohen 1982). Whereas increased response rates after discontinued reinforcement deliveries are readily seen in many animal species (e.g., Amsel and Roussel 1952), it has been difficult to study increased aggressive behavior in laboratory rats and mice (Thompson and Bloom 1966). It will be important to learn how increased aggression is related to other extinction-induced behaviors, in order to assess whether or not this phenomenon is specific to aggressive behavior. Prior to the presentation of the stimulus intruder animals, the experimental mice left bite marks on the response panels in their cage. Increased biting after discontinuation of scheduled reinforcement may represent a form of adjunctive behavior (Falk 1971). It has been postulated that adjunctive behavior or displacement activity has a stabilizing function on agonistic, mating, parental, and intermittent feeding behavior when any of these activities are variable (Falk 1977). It is possible that individuals with low “frustration” tolerance, who rapidly and frequently exhibit intense aggressive behavior, are also likely to engage in other forms of impulsive behavior.
If, in fact, some individuals readily escalate their aggressive behavior as a result of being socially instigated or “frustrated” by the omission of scheduled reinforcement, then it may be informative to characterize them neurochemically. Neuropharmacologic and neurochemical assay data point to serotonin synthesis, release, metabolism, and receptor action as particularly distinctive in impulsively aggressive individuals (Olivier et al. 1995; Higley and Bennett 1999; van Erp and Miczek 2000; Lesch and Merschdorf 2000). The present experiments focused on the effects of anpirtoline because 5-HT1B receptor agonists have been demonstrated to have potent and selective anti-aggressive effects. It was particularly noteworthy in individuals that show high levels of aggression as a result of social instigation or alcohol treatment (Fish et al. 1999; de Almeida et al. 2001; Rilke et al. 2001). In addition, anpirtoline inhibits anxiety-like and depression-like behaviors, pain, and sexual behavior (Schlicker et al. 1992; Metzenauer et al. 1992; Hillegaart and Ahlenius 1998; Bouwknecht et al. 2001; O'Neill and Conway 2001).
The reduction in aggression was antagonized by GR127935, indicated by a rightward shift in the dose-effect curves of anpirtoline, demonstrating the 5-HT1B receptors as the key site of action. There was a tendency for GR127935 to increase species-typical aggressive behavior, but this effect was not statistically significant. GR127935 has also been shown to antagonize the effects of 5-HT1B agonist on locomotion, anxiolytic-like and antidepressant-like responses, cocaine self-administration, and food and alcohol intake (O'Neill et al. 1996; Pauwels et al. 1997; Maurel et al. 1998; Parsons et al. 1998; O'Neill and Conway 2001).
Converging evidence has identified a key role for the 5-HT1B receptors in aggression and violent behavior. Mice lacking the 5-HT1B receptor (1BKO) were found to be more aggressive than their wild-type counterparts (Saudou et al. 1994; Ramboz et al. 1995; Bouwknecht et al. 2001). A number of polymorphisms have been identified in the human 5-HT1B gene (Huang et al. 1999). One of these polymorphisms appears to be associated in two independent populations with antisocial personality disorder and alcoholism (Lappalainen et al. 1998).
The 5-HT1B receptor is found primarily at sites of serotonin release (i.e., synaptic terminals or axonal varicosities), and activation of these receptors inhibits serotonin release (Gothert 1992; Boschert et al. 1994; Davidson and Stamford 1995). On non-serotonergic neurons, the 5-HT1B receptor also is found near points of transmitter release and appears to inhibit the release of other transmitters such as acetylcoline, glutamate, and GABA (Gothert 1992). Based on the present systemic injections with anpirtoline, it is not possible to identify whether the anti-aggressive effects were mediated via pre- or postsynaptic mechanisms. Earlier, we showed that after lesions of the presynaptic and somatodendritic receptors with 5,7-DHT into the raphé nuclei, zolmitriptan or CP-94,253 remained effective to decrease aggressive behavior in male mice (de Almeida et al. 2001). These data suggest that the inhibitory effects of these 5-HT1B receptor agonists involved postsynaptic sites. Furthermore, microinjection studies in rats have shown that the anti-aggressive effects of 5-HT1B receptor agonists are primarily caused by activation of postsynaptic sites (Mos et al. 1993).
In conclusion, our data suggest an essential role of 5-HT1B on heightened aggression in animals. 5-HT1B agonists such as zolmitriptan, CP-94,253, and anpirtoline decreased aggression in individuals that showed moderate and, in particular, high levels of aggressive behavior after social instigation or omission of scheduled reinforcement. These anti-aggressive effects are interpreted as being caused by activation of postsynaptic 5-HT1B receptors, which contribute significantly to the specific modulation of aggression.
References
Amsel A, Roussel J . (1952): Motivational properties of frustration. 1. Effect on a running response of the addition of frustration to the motivational complex. J Exp Psychol 43: 363–368
Azrin NH, Hutchinson RR, Hake DF . (1966): Extinction-induced aggression. J Exp Anal Behav 9: 191–204
Boschert U, Amara DA, Segu L, Hen R . (1994): The mouse 5-hydroxytryptamine 1B receptor is localized perdominatly on axon terminals. Neuroscience 58: 167–182
Bouwknecht JA, Hijzen TH, van der GJ, Maes RA, Hen R, Olivier B . (2001): Absence of 5-HT1B receptors is associated with impaired impulse control in male 5-HT1B knockout mice. Biol Psychiatry 49: 557–568
Brain PF . (1975): What does individual housing mean to a mouse? Life Sci 16: 187–200
Caprara GV . (1982): A comparison of the frustration aggression and emotional susceptibility hypotheses. Aggressive Behav 8: 234–236
Cherek DR, Pickens R . (1970): Schedule-induced aggression as a function of fixed-ratio value. J Exp Anal Behav 14: 309–311
Coccaro EF . (1989): Central serotonin and impulsive aggression. Br J Psychiatry 155: 52–62
Davidson C, Stamford JA . (1995): Evidence that 5-hydroxytryptamine release in rat dorsal raphe nucleus is controlled by 5-HT1A, 5HT1B and 5-HT1D autoreceptors. Br J Pharmacol 114: 1107–1109
de Almeida RMM, Lucion AB . (1994): Effects of intacerebroventricular administration of 5-HT receptor agonists on the maternal aggression of rats. Eur J Pharmacol 264: 445–448
de Almeida RMM, Lucion AB . (1997): 8-OH-DPAT in the median raphe, dorsal periaqueductal gray and corticomedial amygdala nucleus decreases, but in the medial septal area it can increase maternal aggressive behavior in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 134: 392–400
de Almeida RMM, Nikulina E, Faccidomo S, Fish E, Miczek KA . (2001): Zolmitriptan, a 5-HT1B/D receptor agonist, alcohol, and aggression in male mice. Psychopharmacology 157 2: 131–141
Dollard J, Doob L, Miller N, Mowrer O, Sears R . (1939): Frustration and Aggression. New Haven, Yale University Press
Evenden JL, Ryan CN . (1996): The pharmacology of impulsive behaviour in rats: the effects of drugs on response choice with varying delays of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 128: 161–170
Falk JL . (1971): The nature and determinants of adjunctive behavior. Physiol Behav 6: 577–588
Falk JL . (1977): The origin and functions of adjunctive behavior. Anim Learn Behav 5: 325–335
Fish EW, Faccidomo S, Miczek KA . (1999): Aggression heightened by alcohol or social instigation in mice: reduction by the 5-HT1B receptor agonist CP-94,253. Psychopharmacology 146: 391–399
Garattini S, Giacalone E, Valzelli L . (1967): Isolation, aggressiveness and brain 5-hydroxytryptamine turnover. J Pharm Pharmacol 19: 338–339
Gothert M . (1992): 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors: an example for the complexity of chemical transmission of information in the brain. Arzneimittel-Forschung/Drug Res 42: 238–246
Heiligenberg W . (1974): Processing governing behavioral states of readiness. In Lehmrman DS, Rosenblatt JS, Hinde RA, Shaw F (eds), Advances in the Study of Behavior, 5 New York, Academic Press.
Higley JD, Bennett AJ . (1999): Central nervous system serotonin and personality as variables contributing to excessive alcohol consumption in non-human primates. Alcohol Alcohol 34: 402–418
Hillegaart V, Ahlenius S . (1998): Facilitation and inhibition of male rat ejaculatory behaviour by the respective 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor agonists 8-OH-DPAT and anpirtoline, as evidenced by use of the corresponding new and selective receptor antagonists NAD-299 and NAS-181. Br J Pharmacol 125: 1733–1743
Huang YY, Grailhe R, Arango V, Hen R, Mann JJ . (1999): Relationship of psychopathology to the human serotonin 1B genotype and receptor binding kinectics in postmortem brain tissue. Neuropsychopharmacology 21: 238–246
Kelly DD . (1974): The experimental imperative: laboratory analyses of aggressive behaviors. In: Frazier SH (ed), Aggression. Research Publications Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Diseases. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins Co
Krsiak M . (1975): Timid singly-housed mice: their value in prediction of psychotropic activity of drugs. Br J Pharmacol 55: 141–150
Krsiak M . (1979): Effects of drugs on behaviour of aggressive mice. Br J Pharmacol 65: 525–533
Lagerspetz K, Hautojarvi S . (1967): The effect of prior aggressive or sexual arousal on subsequent aggressive or sexual reactions in male mice. Scand J Psychol 8: 1–6
Lagerspetz KMJ . (1969): Aggression and aggressiveness in laboratory mice. In: Garattini S (ed), Aggressive Behaviour. Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica Foundation
Lappalainen J, Long JC, Eggert M, Ozaki N, Robin RW, Brown GL, Naukkarinen H, Virkkunen M, Linnoila M, Goldman D . (1998): Linkage of antisocial alcoholism to the serotonin 5-HT1B receptor gene in 2 populations. Arch Gen Psychiatry 55: 989–994
Lee MD, Aloyo VJ, Fluharty SJ, Simansky KJ . (1998): Infusion of the serotonin1B (5-HT1B) agonist CP-93,129 into the parabrachial nucleus potently and selectively reduces food intake in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 136: 304–307
Lesch KP, Merschdorf U . (2000): Impulsivity, aggression, and serotonin: a molecular psychobiological perspective. Behav Sci Law 18: 581–604
Linnoila M, Virkkunen M, Scheinin M, Nuutila A, Rimon R, Goodwin FK . (1983): Low cerebrospinal fluid 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid concentration differentiates impulsive from nonimpulsive violent behavior. Life Sci 33: 2609–2614
Looney TA, Cohen PS . (1982): Aggression induced by intermittent positive reinforcement. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 6: 15–37
Maurel S, Schreiber R, De Vry J . (1998): Role of 5-HT1B, 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors in the generalization of 5-HT receptor agonists to the ethanol cue in the rat. Behav Pharmacol 9: 337–343
Metzenauer P, Barnes NM, Costall B, Gozlan H, Hamon M, Kelly ME, Murphy DA, Naylor RJ . (1992): Anxiolytic-like actions of anpirtoline in a mouse light-dark aversion paradigm. Biobehav Rev 3: 527–529
Miczek KA . (1982): Ethological analysis of drug action on aggression, defense and defeat. In: Spiegelstein MY (eds), Behavioral Models and the Analysis of Drug Action. Amsterdam, Elsevier
Miczek KA . (2001): Research on Animal Aggression: Emerging Successes for Understanding Determinants of Human Violence. In: Carrol ME, Overmier JB (eds), Animal Research and Human Health: Advancing Human Welfare through Behavioral Science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Miczek KA, de Almeida RMM . (2001): Oral drug self-administration in the home cage of mice: alcohol-heightened aggression and inhibition by the 5-HT1B agonist anpirtoline. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 157 (4): 421–429
Miczek KA, O'Donnell JM . (1978): Intruder-evoked aggression in isolated and nonisolated mice: effects of psychomotor stimulants and l-DOPA. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 57: 47–55
Miczek KA, Hussain S, Faccidomo S . (1998): Alcohol-heightened aggression in mice: attenuation by 5-HT1A receptor agonists. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 139: 160–168
Miczek KA, Maxson SC, Fish EW, Faccidomo S . (2001): Aggressive behavioral phenotypes in mice. Behav Brain Res 125: 167–181
Miczek KA, O'Donnell JM . (1980): Alcohol and chlordiazepoxide increase suppressed aggression in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 69: 39–44
Mos J, Olivier B, Poth M, Aken H . (1992): The effects of intraventricular administration of eltoprazine, 1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl) piperazine hydrochloride and 8-OH-DPAT on resident intruder aggression in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol 212: 295–298
Mos J, Olivier B, Poth M, Van Oorschot R, Van Aken H . (1993): The effects of dorsal raphe administration of eltoprazine, TFMPP and 8-OH- DPAT on resident intruder aggression in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol 238: 411–415
National Research Council. (1996): Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
O'Neill MF, Conway MW . (2001): Role of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors in the mediation of behavior in the forced swim test in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 24: 391–398
O'Neill MF, Fernandez AG, Palacios JM . (1996): GR 127935 blocks the locomotor and antidepressant-like effects of RU 24969 and the action of antidepressants in the mouse tail suspension test. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 53: 535–539
Olivier B, Mos J, Van Oorschot R, Hen R . (1995): Serotonin receptors and animal models of aggressive behavior. Pharmacopsychiatry 28: 80–90
Parsons LH, Weiss F, Koob GF . (1998): Serotonin 1B receptor stimulation enhances cocaine reinforcement. J Neurosci 18: 10078–10089
Pauwels PJ, Tardiff S, Palmier C, Wurch T, Colpaert FC . (1997): How efficacious are 5-HT1B/D receptor ligands: an answer from GTPγS binding studies with stably transfected C-glial cell lines. Neuropharmacology 36: 499–512
Payne AP, Andrews MJ, Wilson CA . (1984): Housing, fighting and biogenic amines in the midbrain and hypothalamus of the golden hamster. In: Miczek KA (ed), Ethopharmacological Aggression Research New York, Alan R. Liss
Potegal M . (1991): Attack priming and satiation in female golden hamsters: tests of some alternatives to the aggression arousal interpretation. Aggress Behav 17: 327–335
Potegal M . (1992): Time course of aggressive arousal in female hamsters and male rats. Behav Neural Biol 58: 120–124
Potegal M, Tenbrink L . (1984): Behavior of attack-primed and attack-satiated female golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). J Comp Psychol 98: 66–75
Ramboz S, Saudou F, Amara DA, Belzung C, Segu L, Misslin R, Buhot MC, Hen R . (1995): 5-HT1B receptor knock out – Behavioral consequences. Behav Brain Res 73: 305–312
Rilke O, Will K, Jahkel M, Oehler J . (2001): Behavioral and neurochemical effects of anpirtoline and citalopram in isolated and group housed mice. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 25: 1125–1144
Sanchez C, Arnt J, Hyttel J, Moltzen EK . (1993): The role of serotonergic mechanisms in inhibition of isolation-induced aggression in male mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 110: 53–59
Saudou F, Amara DA, Dierich A, Lemeur M, Ramboz S, Segu L, Buhot MC, Hen R . (1994): Enhanced aggressive behavior in mice lacking 5-HT1B receptor. Sci 265: 1875–1878
Schlicker E, Werner U, Hamon M, Gozlan H, Nickel B, Szelenyi I, Gothert M . (1992): Anpirtoline, a novel, highly potent 5-HT1B receptor agonist with antinociceptive/antidepressant-like actions in rodents. Br J Pharmacol 105: 732–738
Stenfors C, Yu H, Svante BR . (2000): Enhanced 5-HT metabolism and synthesis rate by the new selective r5-HT1B receptor antagonist, NAS-181 in the rat brain. Neuropharmacology 39: 553–560
Swedberg MD, Shannon HE, Nickel B, Goldberg SR . (1992): D-16949 (anpirtoline): a novel serotonergic (5-HT1B) psychotherapeutic agent assessed by its discriminative effects in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 263: 1015–1022
Tellegen A, Horn JM . (1972): Primary aggressive motivation in three inbred strains of mice. J Comp Physiol Psychol 78: 297–304
Thompson T, Bloom W . (1966): Aggressive behavior and extinction-induced response-rate increase. Psychonomic Sci 5: 335–336
Thor DH, Carr WJ . (1979): Sex and aggression: Competitive mating strategy in the male rat. Behav Neural Biol 26: 261–265
Thor DH, Flannelly KJ . (1979): Copulation and intermale aggression in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93: 223–228
Valzelli L, Giacalone E, Garattini S . (1967): Pharmacological control of aggressive behavior in mice. Eur J Pharmacol 2: 144–146
van Erp AMM, Miczek KA . (2000): Aggressive behavior, increased accumbal dopamine and decreased cortical seroton.
Virkkunen M, De Jong J, Barko J, Goodwin FK, Linnoila M . (1989): Relationship of psychobiological variables to recidivism in violent offenders and impulsive fire setters. Arch Gen Psychiatry 46: 600–603
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by USPHS research grant AA05122 and DA02632 (KAM, PI). RMMdA was supported by a fellowship from CAPES (Brazil) and UNISINOS (Brazil). We thank Mr. J. Thomas Sopko for outstanding technical assistance,.and Mr. E. Fish for valuable advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Almeida, R., Miczek, K. Aggression Escalated by Social Instigation or by Discontinuation of Reinforcement (“Frustration”) in Mice: Inhibition by Anpirtoline: A 5-HT1B Receptor Agonist. Neuropsychopharmacol 27, 171–181 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-133X(02)00291-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-133X(02)00291-9
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Modelling sexual violence in male rats: the sexual aggression test (SxAT)
Translational Psychiatry (2022)
-
Recent advances in the study of aggression
Neuropsychopharmacology (2019)
-
Dopamine disruption increases negotiation for cooperative interactions in a fish
Scientific Reports (2016)
-
Stress and the social brain: behavioural effects and neurobiological mechanisms
Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2015)
-
Regulation of Potential-Dependent Ca2+ Channels by Serotonin 5-HT1B Receptors in Different Populations of Hippocampal Neurons
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology (2014)