Abstract
AT the recent International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, many of the papers contained discussions of phonemes and phonology. There were nearly as many definitions of a phoneme as there were papers, and nobody seemed to have any clear idea of what was meant by the term. The hope was expressed that perhaps the psychologists might be able to discover what a phoneme is. At the Congress dinner, one speaker compared the hunting of the phoneme to the hunting of the snark—with the difference that at least there was a snark. Apparently the phoneme was smiled out of existence. This, however, was not the fault of the phoneme, but of the hunters who failed to find it. The nature of language shows that phonemes do exist, and the successful study of language requires that they shall be found.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SCRIPTURE, E. Phonemes. Nature 136, 261–262 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1038/136261c0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/136261c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.