Abstract
ON the basis of their experimental data, Hinshel-wood and Grant1 arrive at the conclusion that the rupture of the reaction chains in the gas phase is due to ternary collisions, the latter fact being responsible for the existence of the upper pressure limit. A similar view was expressed by me in 1930 as the result of the experimental work carried out at the Leningrad Physical-Technical Institute. As early as then, I believed that the existence of the upper limit could be interpreted only on the assumption of the deactivation process in the gas phase being due to ternary collisions. Indeed, the velocity of a chain reaction is w = n0/—, where n0 is the number of initial centres, the probability of rupture, and that of branching. The condition for the existence of an upper limit is — = 0. If both breaking and branching of chains are due to double collisions, the values of and will depend on the same order of the pressure, which leads to the absence of any upper pressure limit of ignition. For the existence of an upper limit, should depend upon a higher order of pressure than. Thus, for example, if the branching of chains required double collisions, their rupture should be brought into relation with ternary collisions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hinshelwood and Grant, Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 141, 29; 1933.
Kopp, Kowalsky, Sagulin, Semenoff, Z. phys. Chem., 6 B, 307; 1930.
Semenoff, Chem. Rev., 6, 347; 1929.
Hinshelwood, Thompson, Hadman, Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 138, 297; 1932.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SEMENOFF, N. Upper Pressure Limit of Ignition. Nature 132, 566–567 (1933). https://doi.org/10.1038/132566b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/132566b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.