Abstract
DR. A. PINEY, in his letter to NATURE of Feb. 28, accuses me of reviving a dormant form of vitalism, but with the deification of entelechy I certainly have no association. He says, “The sterility of vitalistic hypotheses in the past leads one to doubt their fertility in the future”, but the fecundity of alternative hypotheses is not conspicuous.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MACGREGOR, M. Embryology and Evolution. Nature 127, 595 (1931). https://doi.org/10.1038/127595a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/127595a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.