Abstract
URANIUM and thorium being the two amongst the old elements which are unstable, and being nearly at the end of the Periodic Table, is there any more reason to regard these as the last to remain unstable, than to regard them as the first to become unstable? If they represent the last to become unstable, we might suppose that all the other elements had passed through an unstable stage and in the course of ages to have become stable, thus throwing the greater part of the earth's history into the past, with less to come in the future. If, however, we suppose that only two elements have reached the unstable stage, all the remainder will have to come to this stage in turn, thus giving to the earth a tremendously long future as compared with that which is past.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MARTIN, E. The Course of Instability of Elements. Nature 116, 866 (1925). https://doi.org/10.1038/116866d0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/116866d0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.