Abstract
THE apparent inconsistency between the statistics quoted by Dr. Pascoe and the statement to which he refers can be explained only by fuller reference to the contributions of the Imperial Institute to the development of the rare earth industry. It should be mentioned that in accordance with general usage, as, for example, in the annual article in “Mineral Industry”, monazite sand was used to cover other sources of thoria. In 1903–4 the present writer was endeavouring to secure an output for the monazite of another part of the Empire, but found it was impossible owing to the German monopoly. Shortly afterwards the discovery in Ceylon of thorite and thorianite, with more than 75 per cent, of thoria, and of a monazite which is unusually rich in thoria, first gave British manufacturers a commercially useful independent source of thoria. In 1906 a sudden rise in prices due to German manipulation led to more active search. English manufacturers, according to “Mineral Industry”, 1906, p. 586, “hitherto dependent upon German firms for their supplies, now have hopes that the discoveries of monazite and thorianite in Ceylon and the Transvaal will allow them to avail themselves of an opportunity to obtain an independent supply of raw material”.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Monazite Sands and other Sources of Thoria. Nature 113, 238–239 (1924). https://doi.org/10.1038/113238c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/113238c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.