(1) A Study in Realism (2) Studies in Contemporary Metaphysics

Abstract

(1) “IL faut bien plus de principes que vous ne pensez pour denontrer ce dont personne ne doute,” observes Malebranche in his “Entretiens Metaphysiques.” This came to mind in reading the quotation from his adversary Arnauld which Prof. Laird has placed at the head of the introduction to his “Study in Realism.” There can be no knowledge without object known, is the gist of Arnauld's-remark. How undeniable ! And yet Prof. Laird has to write a book and hint to us that he finds it difficult to keep his study within reasonable bounds. The realists are all alike; they disarm their adversaries by the naïveté of their definition, only to discover that there is no end to the diversity of meanings their professedly obvious affirmation may cover. “If the shade of Reid could visit these regions to-day it would greet Mr. Prichard, of Oxford; but it would be startled by Mr. Alexander, bewildered by Mr. Russell, and distressed by Mr. Holt. Indeed, one is tempted to think that any realism defined to the quick becomes nothing but the definer's private philosophy.” Such is one realist's confession.

(1) A Study in Realism.

By Prof. J. Laird. Pp. xii + 228. (Cambridge: At the University Press, 1920.) 14s. net.

(2) Studies in Contemporary Metaphysics.

By Prof. R. F. A. Hoernlé. Pp. ix + 314. (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, and Co., Ltd., 1920.) 16s. net.