Abstract
IN the article on “Microkinematography” in NATURE of December 14, 1911, there are one or two points which are expressed in a manner that may lead to misconception. Dealing with these as they occur, is it correct to describe the process as having been developed during the last few months? The method adopted by M. Comandon was described in La Nature so long ago as November, 1909, and reproductions of kinematograph films were used to illustrate the paper. In this country, too, Dr. Spitta has done and has exhibited numerous examples, and I believe I am right in stating that his work extends back to an even earlier date.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BARNARD, J. Microkinematography. Nature 88, 312 (1912). https://doi.org/10.1038/088312a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/088312a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.