Abstract
IN view of the correspondence which has taken place recently in NATURE on this subject, I should like to refer to the results of some further investigations which I have made in conjunction with Mr. J. R. Hill in continuation of those published in the Journal of the Chemical Society in 1905. In that paper, and in other previous publications, experimental evidence was brought forward to show that the rusting of iron can take place in the absence of carbon dioxide, contrary to the generally accepted view. Several chemists have addressed themselves to the task of defending the old opinion that carbon dioxide is necessary. Their arguments were summarised recently in an article in NATURE initialled “T. M. L.” No exception can be taken to this article if its limitations are clearly recognised. It omits all reference to the large body of experimental work which has been published by Whitney, Tilden and others, in addition to myself, to show that the old view must be abandoned. The most recent work of Lambert and Thomson confirms this conclusion, whilst making an important addition to our knowledge of the conditions of reaction between iron, oxygen, and water when brought together in the most highly purified forms.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DUNSTAN, W. The Rusting of Iron. Nature 86, 381–382 (1911). https://doi.org/10.1038/086381c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/086381c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.