Abstract
UNTIL I read the two letters in NATURE of July 22 and August 12 I had no idea that the ringing of house-bells without apparent cause was so fascinating a subject, as my own experience of it has been rather prosaic. One of my bells occasionally rings when no one is in the room, but it is entirely due to bad workmanship. The strength of the spring which draws the wire back after it has been pulled is only about equal to the friction of the wires, and the result is that, though it generally draws the wire back immediately after it has been pulled, yet it sometimes fails to do so at the time; but after some time, it may be hours, owing to some change in the conditions, it succeeds in drawing back the wire, when the bell again rings when no one is touching it. The bell thus rings once when it is pulled, and a second time when the spring succeeds in drawing back the wire.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
AITKEN, J. The Ringing of House-bells without Apparent Cause. Nature 81, 246–247 (1909). https://doi.org/10.1038/081246d0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/081246d0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.