Abstract
IN NATURE, May 18, I gave a calculation of the coefficient of complete radiation at a given absolute temperature for waves of great length on principles laid down in 1900, and it appeared that the result was eight times as great as that deduced from Planck's formula for this case. In connection with similar work of his own, Mr. Jeans (Phil. Mag., July) has just pointed out that I have introduced a redundant factor 8 by counting negative as well as positive values of my integers ξ, η, ζ.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
RAYLEIGH The Constant of Radiation as Calculated from Molecular Data. Nature 72, 243–244 (1905). https://doi.org/10.1038/072243d0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/072243d0
This article is cited by
-
Underlying probability distributions of Planck's radiation law
International Journal of Theoretical Physics (1990)
-
Max Planck and the beginnings of the quantum theory
Archive for History of Exact Sciences (1961)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.