Abstract
THE answer to the question, “Can an animal reason?” depends upon the sense in which the word “reason” is used. If dog-stories are to be accepted as evidence, the question must be answered in the affirmative, even though the most liberal, and human, significance be attached to the word. It is, however, of great importance that data should be obtained under conditions which can be rigidly controlled, in order that the credibility of anecdotes may be tested by the results of observations which can be easily repeated. Already excellent work has been done in this field by Lloyd Morgan, Thorndike, Small, Mills, Hob-house, and others, but the science of animal psychology is still in its infancy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
HILL, A. Can Dogs Reason?. Nature 67, 558–559 (1903). https://doi.org/10.1038/067558d0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/067558d0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.