Abstract
As one closely connected with scientific fisheries work on the North Sea, I cannot help taking a keen interest in the proposals that emanated from the Stockholm Congress, and in the criticisms that have appeared in NATURE on those proposals. These criticisms have been decidedly adverse, and readers of this journal who take an interest in fishery questions and research, but who have not been in a position to obtain the knowledge necessary to judge fairly the points in dispute, will naturally feel somewhat perplexed over the difficulties that have arisen. As the matter is of the greatest importance to Great Britain, with its large fishing industry, this perplexity is to be regretted, because it is very necessary that something like unanimity should obtain amongst those who have charge of affairs. This unanimity will come with greater clearness on the points at issue, and in order to aid towards this clearness I would ask your permission to allow me to continue the discussion.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
KYLE, H. Proposals of the Stockholm Fisheries Conference. Nature 61, 151–152 (1899). https://doi.org/10.1038/061151a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/061151a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.