Abstract
YOUR columns are eagerly searched every week for information regarding the latest developments of radiography, and for the best methods of working. I think it may be said that we are still in a state of empiricism as to the technique of the subject. We can get fair representations of most of the bones in the human body, though we have much to learn even in this elementary detail. But the definition of the soft parts with sufficient accuracy for diagnostic purposes is still, so far as I am aware, beyond us.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LOWE, G. Radiography. Nature 55, 154–155 (1896). https://doi.org/10.1038/055154c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/055154c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
