Abstract
I GATHER from Mr. Culverwell's last letter (NATURE, April 18), and Mr. Bryan's (May 9), that we may regard the following conclusion as established, namely, the proof of the H theorem, for any system depends on a certain condition (A) being fulfilled among the coordinates and momenta of the molecules forming the system. Considering these as elastic spheres, and using Dr. Watson's notation, fdp1 … dq3 is the chance that a sphere shall have for coordinates and momenta p1 … p1+ap1, &c., and FdP1…dQ3 the chance that another sphere shall have P1 … P1+dP1, &c. The condition required is that f and F are independent, even for two spheres on the point of collision.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BURBURY, S. Boltzmann's Minimum Function. Nature 52, 104–105 (1895). https://doi.org/10.1038/052104b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/052104b0
This article is cited by
-
In Praise of Clausius Entropy: Reassessing the Foundations of Boltzmannian Statistical Mechanics
Foundations of Physics (2021)
-
?Will someone say exactly what the H-theorem proves?? A study of Burbury's Condition A and Maxwell's Proposition II
Archive for History of Exact Sciences (1994)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.